Cheeks
>▶Anonymous 02/25/20 (Tue) 21:31:52 5eb1d7 (2)  No.8250730>>8250807
>>>8250657
>>Referring to an interview from about Jan 2010:
>We recently received 11 pages of information from an insider who was physically present at a meeting of Senior Masons in the City of London in 2005. What was discussed is chilling to the bone.
>>excerpt:
>B: Okay. So just to go back to what I mentioned a minute ago, about two birds with one stone. One goal here, then, is to establish a united alliance of Western countries with a kind of totalitarian "emergency war footing", heavy control aspect to it. And the other aspect is actually to light the fire of this war, which will result in all kinds of chaos and presumably an enormous number of people dying somewhere.
>W: Yes.
>B: The Chinese population? Or everyone on the planet? Is this part of the population reduction plan? What did they say?
>W: Well, there was talk about biological agents being used, described as being flu-like and it would spread like wildfire. Now, they didn't mention it at this meeting, but I know now that it will attack people genetically, not everybody together. How that would happen… I'm not a geneticist, I really don't know. One can only assume that it's linked to DNA in some way.
>B: Mm hm.
>W: And the differences that are found in DNA. These differences have been identified and the viruses can be made that could kill a person off and do it quite quickly.
>B: And so the viruses are genetically targeted is what you're saying?
>W: Yes.
>B: Genetically targeted for racial type, or more specific even than that?
>W: Racial type. I can be quite definite on that. They're talking about extinction of a whole part of the human race, doing so genetically.
>B: Really? Did they mention that in this meeting, in those terms?
>W: Not exactly. Those are my terms. But this is how it was mentioned, and this is my recall of it and how this came out and how I've interpreted it.
>B: Okay.
>W: But that's what it most definitely alluded to.
>B: Are they talking about getting the Chinese out of the way because they're an inconvenient major group that's not playing ball with the global plans? Or are they talking about this as an excuse to thin down the entire world's population, including that in the Western countries?
>W: Well, it's a very good question and as far as I can see, it's a hypothetical one. Again, I can't give you an answer to that one. From a personal point of view, it definitely appears to be a thinning of the world's population and it's getting it down into a controllable size for this government that's going to come, in order for them to have the control that they wish for. Otherwise, they wouldn't have it.
>It even sickens me to speak about this now, it really does. It sickens me no end that they would go ahead and do this sort of thing; that such things have actually been spoken about. They're bringing the population down to what they coldly believe to be a "manageable level".
>B: Can you reference in this meeting that you attended to those levels, or the numbers, or the percentages, or anything tangible that you can remember?
>W: Yes. They're talking about half.
>B: Wow. That's a lot of people.
>W: Yes. It is.
>B: Okay.
>W: That's bringing it back down by half.
>B: So that's more than the Chinese, then. That answers that question, doesn't it?
>http://projectcamelot.org/anglo_saxon_mission.html
>http://projectcamelot.org/lang/en/anglo_saxon_mission_interview_transcript_en.html