Watching for an EO from POTUS, now that the Senate has twice failed to protect infants from PP's practice of outright INFANTICIDE (QPost 2897 attached)!

NOTE that in Nat'l Review Article Q just highlighted in #3866, it states that the D's didn't even attempt to defend their filibustering of the bill this year by making remarks on the Senate Fl., which they did in 2019.

[They] know that infanticide is indefensible now, and that the[y] have certainly lost the ability to control/frame a defense narrative:

'Notably, very few Democratic senators took to the floor to deliver remarks explaining their votes against the legislation. Yesterday evening, Senator Steve Daines (R., Mt.), who founded the Senate’s first pro-life caucus, led several Republicans in a colloquy to deliver floor remarks in support of the bill.

“The next bill we will be voting on tomorrow is the Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act,” Daines said, “which mandates that if a baby is born alive following a botched abortion, the doctor must protect that baby and give the same medical care that any other baby would receive. Is that too much to ask for?”

Daines also noted that Americans support legislation to protect infants born under such circumstances, citing a survey last year that found that 77 percent of self-described pro-choice voters believe babies born alive should be medically protected.'

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/born-alive-abortion-survivors-protection-act-fails-in-the-senate/

Compare to comments the D's made on the Senate last yr to defend their opposition to the bill:

'During the floor debate over the bill this afternoon, several Democratic senators said they planned to oppose the legislation because they believe it limits women’s health-care options. “That is the actual intent of this bill, reducing access to safe abortion care would threaten the health of women in Hawaii,” said Mazie Hirono (D., Hawaii).

“This bill is just another line of attack in the ongoing war on women’s health,” said Jeanne Shaheen (D., N.H.).

Tina Smith, Democrat of Minnesota, said the born-alive bill “would override physicians’ professional judgment about what is best for their patients, and it would put physicians in the position of facing criminal penalties if their judgment about what is best for their patient is contrary to what is described in this bill.”

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/born-alive-bill-fails-to-pass-senate-vote/

Stage is set, watch the pen because a POTUS EO is next according to Q's Map #3897 – INCOMING Q Proof.