>>8254043 (lb)
you think in hateful slogans, 'ok boom errr' saying freak.
you must be freaking out! you have a bear with you? what do yo live in the Sierra Nevada?
everything from the past is conflated with 'death cult' and, in fact, probably was something utterly different.
like a 'life religion' that we can not currently comprehend.
many narratives were made up in the last couple hundred years concerning antiquity, and ancient times.
Roman's built buildings that lasted.
some of their institutions, not so much. This is the Roman Senate Building. Very famous people were involved with it's construction.
The building is ironic in that at the time of it's construction the body in which would reside had lost a lot of their power within the government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curia_Julia
preferred the wired connection or the fiber connection.
fiber connection to sniffer box to fiber to your router.
that would be one method.
wireless is stupid in a very lot of ways.
It will need to be heavily regulated to prevent the misuse of array attenna devices that could also be used to target a localle near by the antenna.
In a stadium situation with thousands of phones, a death 'burst' could be made from all the antenna to target a single location within a volume of space.
as one device, it' might be safe.
whene there are thousands of them, they need to be monitored. the use of it should be regulated.
my advice would be to set up a honey pot where you pretend there is a vulnerability like that and then see who comes snooping around to try and access it.
(so my description might just be a rouse to set up a trap.)
the best way to deal with security online is to be open and honest.
using 'encryption' for finance seems worthy.
using it for comms? it's like turning on a beacon: I might be doing bad things.
how does that happen?
toomuch black border name fag is now signing his posts with a tiny flag?
Does it (because these kinds of entities are usually team creatures) know that it is doing this?
does it think the symbol is one thing and it shows up as something else? Unicode doesn't give you a guaraantee that the glyph will show up the same in a different font.
anyway, your mysterious post has my attention as I have observed the shills, and they do tend to give themselves away.
most of them are sock-puppets of name fags, mimics, who use the same images over and over, or screen caps that are stupidly over sized.
that twit (t-where-it) got snippitty at me one day about the file size. So you work with this and discover what it does?
I've backed off from posting older memes because I know that they use it identify us.
I've charted their gangstaulking behavior. They work like grifters in tourist europe, they'll throw bird pooh on you and then, as they 'help you' they rob you.
so yes, original content every time throws an egg in their fan.
another tact would be to have multiple sets of images if you need them, and never mix them.
or intentionally post one of theirs.
if all that shit happens to you that you suggest he'll not be well enough to understand what he might be wrong about, or level headed enough to accept that he'd made mistakes, and that might throw him even farther down into the well of hell and tar-nation, and sickness unto death, which means he'll never make it back out the other side and emerge into ascendence where you and he can perhaps come to some kind of mutual and respectful acceptence of difference, and a holy kind of reconciliation where you understand the issues, and each deal with your own issues, meanwhile supporting each other to solve mutual problems, and help the other people around you, for a better world.
So be care envoking names of who are involved with your battle. The involvment of others might not be apprciatted by those others, esspeciallly since just igoring the other anon . . . would be no problem at all.