Well, for some others it is the exact opposite. Surely you've heard or read mention of the 1950's as some horrible hell by the Left? They really do look at it that way because now they are "liberated" pursue any/all debauchery and be totally hedonistic and conduct themselves with no responsibility for their choices or behavior.
Really, it's a spelling mistake.
Before calling for a dig, it is always best to check on qresear.ch first to see if a) it has already been done, and if so b) where to start.
ABJ has been dug on quite a bit.
>if aliens ruled us we'd know.
Not if they were smarter than you and didn't want you to know. I'm not advocating for that anon's position, but I just wanted to point that out.
IMO those will not be effective. Using Lenin, Stalin or Mao would be more realistic.
>they would be SO powerful that they would have zero need to rule from the shadows.
That is supposition on your part. One possibility could also be that they do not need to but choose to.
>to rule another planet with intelligent beings?
In the larger scheme of things, we may not be all that intelligent as compared to others, to believe so is self-importance.
>aliens may exist elsewhere in the universe but they are not in control of the earth.
Supposition stated as fact does not make it fact.
Not really. Humans have left the planet Earth and been to the moon. We are, in effect, alien to that place. "Consider the vastness of space" is the logical answer because statistically it's nearly impossible for us to the only life, much less intelligent life. You stated your supposition as facts, not opinion or supposition.
More supposition put forth as fact.
You need to work on logic, fren, and learn to think outside of only 2 options.
I'm not cartoon anon, but I did save them. Remember to right click on the link over the image and choose "save link as" for the full sized image and not thumbnails.
There is no twisting on my part. You stated your suppositions as facts, when they are no such thing. And now hurl the label of shill because you are unable to argue your own case. Sad.
Not everyone agrees here, and your ideas and analysis must be able to withstand scrutiny. Those scrutinizing are not necessarily your opponents or a "shill" it is the natural process here. If your ideas or analysis cannot withstand the scrutiny it should tell you something.