>>8258754

I don't understand the logic of the caps of the most recent 3 Q posts. The point of the caps is to capture tweets, vids or other content that is external to this board. Capping Q posts or the anon Q replied to seems pointless IMO as both are just as vulnerable to deletion by BO if he wanted.

>>8258896

sigh

Caps for posts that Q can delete (ie GA, PF, or PDC boards) make sense. The rest do not.

I guess it's baker's discretion, so whatever.