Anonymous ID: 41a5cd Feb. 26, 2020, 6:56 p.m. No.8260950   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1008 >>1044 >>1061

>>8260871

>Pretty sure youโ€™re a fucking moran that lacks the simplest logic.

What this statement tells anons is that you're a leftie shill.

Anons don't need to use "fucking" as a descriptive word. We actually have the ability to think, and can come up with any number of choices.

You're trying to blend in by using the word "moran", but quickly follow it with demoralizationfagging.

 

You've had some training, but you're still a low grade wanker. Please try a little harder next time so it'll be at least a little challenging.

Anonymous ID: 41a5cd Feb. 26, 2020, 7:17 p.m. No.8261152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1195 >>1228

>>8261093

>What if the new "car-sized moon" is an experimental antigrav vehicle that malfunctioned and got away during a test?

News of atomic engines during the last few days, and plans of orbits between geosynchronous and moon. Any chance that the car-sized moon is an atomic engine just waiting for something to push?

Anonymous ID: 41a5cd Feb. 26, 2020, 7:21 p.m. No.8261180   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1196

>>8261157

>The โ€œplanโ€โ€ฆ..

>Eat popcorn while the enemy kills American babies and sells their pieces. All the while posting photos of naked whores and selling jap sex toys and pretending to be patriotic Christians. Anyone not stupid enough to buy into it just call a โ€œshillโ€

WTF do you know about the plan, faggot?

You didn't even begin to bring up the important parts.

Anonymous ID: 41a5cd Feb. 26, 2020, 7:27 p.m. No.8261228   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8261195

>>8261152 (me)

>I like that theory.

>Even if it's not an engine

I never bought the story about sending the car up on the falcon heavy. Great PR, but no logical reason.

Even just sending up a load of reactor mass for a future atomic engine would be a better choice.