>>826488

It's not an illegal leak if authorized by POTUS. AIM speculates for the purpose of gaining viewer$.

>>825929

>>825909

The context suggests that the Very BAD thing HDC did on 2.12.09 was a leak.

>>827045

>>825929

>>825909

HRC involved in Manning leak?

Between Jan. 13 and Feb. 19 this year, Manning allegedly passed one of the cables, titled “Reykjavik 13,” to an unauthorized party, the Army states. The Army doesn’t name Wikileaks as the recipient of the document, but last February the site published a classified cable titled “Reykjavik 9” that describes a U.S. embassy meeting with the government of Iceland.