>>8263506
'destined to rule'
funny.
so yours is the suppremicist, we are better than you, narrative?
in the narrative that I heard all the good people became Christians after 72 AD or so, and then it took a long time for the empire to go that way.
meanwhile in Central Asia . . . and India . . .
that narrative has problems too
so you're is 'chosen and better than all the rest'.
which ignores some various obvious things: they used the females as a way to take over other moieties.
a lot of patriarchal moieties didn't understand that the men were cuckolds and the women really were ruling. So when they married in, they didn't understand that the rule of men would be over.
so there is that narrative too.
but yours : the super race was thrown down through ? ? ? was it sin? oh, no, it was 'satan or the devil' even though that was shown to be allegorical to just 'bad spirit' and even St Peter was called Satan . . . so they were subverted . . . to become the victim people of the world?
so that it was alright for their halfling kids to be all pissed off. He's not a girl, he can't produce real ones for the matriarchy to expand . . .
only the females really mattered in that world so they send the men off to be hot head bullies (unless they are a full born?).
but you see that narrative is fake too.
The way a lot see it: there were jews all over. Some of them made up stories and everyone knew it was fiction. They called it the collection of fictions and narratives for gullible rubes.
then the invasion of the mongul types who kidnap and steal babies? or were those romany? or tartarians? or Kulochs? what slur word can we use. In that fake narrative (how fake is it?) we have these people showing up and they are cammellians and they pretend to be whatever they need to pretend to be.
meanwhile we had the ones from Spain who were running it all before the Fred and Isablea dealleo, and they kicked them out (because they were the leaders and responsible for 'the goyem' being so hard on the Christians.
so they go elsewhere and then they see these fakers from cnetral asia who have usurped the ancient religion and they think 'oye, how do we make some money. I know, we'll sell them these books. they'll have to know it's fake. What we do we care if they know it's fake, we need to feed our babbies?
in that narrative it's more true to life, people make an ecconomic decision based upon necessity. So they weren't really spreading stories of how to be diabolical (the stories were probably meant to spark outrage so a teacher could tell te student 'you are right, it was a false narrative').
after that the banksters?
crypto jews from antiquity?
the real romans?
bullshit bullshit?
vampires from Tartaria?
more bullshit?
all of these narratives seem like bullshit to me.
the scary part is that some would not even let me have any of it, even if I'd label it fiction, even if I'd pretend that I'm not talking about the socioecconomic beginnings of what is now known to be 'the cabal'
I like the narrative where pepole are people, learn from their mistakes, and there has been so much mixing over the years that everyone is partly descended from Abbraham or David.
and yet that, too, is another fantasy.
Teh real story ??
Commies from Georgia pretending to be Ukranine jues pretending to be Russians, pretending to be Iranians, used the sexcult of Marxism to almost take over the whole world and all the other narratives are inconsequential.
that is prob not the real story either.
your narrative, anon, is more false than any of my false narratives, provided above which I will bravely post despite knowing . . . what some will say