>I'm really starting to believe that these fashion houses are nothing but fronts for sex trafficking.
Interesting theory
>Surely they can't be making any money from the ridiculous and hideous designs.
Yet, the price tag is always an astronomical number. Easy way to charge someone on paper for "goods" and provide them with other "services" off the record…
>Has anyone ever seen anyone actually dress like this…ever?? No.
I was gonna say, "no", but you already did for me. Well, technically, we do see these outrageous outfits. Worn by various celebrities at their stupid award shows. Which is weird because those also happen to be the types of people we suspect of being involved in ritualistic sex abuse and what have you. Do you think they could be flaunting these stupid outfits as a way to brag about what they plan to do later? We do know they love throwing things right in front of our faces because they think we are too stupid to figure it out. Hmmm…
>No one is buying this crap.
I sure as hell wouldn't pay 5 or 6 figures for a goofy outfit, you can basically only wear one time. At least from a "we're rich and famous, take pictures of us" perspective. Clearly, these would be one time wears. One could almost see them as rentals. Sometimes they might even find there way into auctions later, in one of those "as worn by" so-and-so at such-and such. Which is really just another way to jack up the price, and offer more of those "off the record" types of transactions.
>It's got to be purely a front.
Think you're on to something…