Anonymous ID: bb510d Feb. 28, 2020, 2:29 p.m. No.8277771   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7944

>>8277672

Good digs anon. I have a feeling that some of those emails are going to tie in to something that gets revealed soon.

 

If I remember correctly, Libya was considering leaving the US dollar and starting their own currency backed by gold. He would have required that Libyan oil be bought with said currency; this likely did not sit well with HRC's or Obama's overlords, thus you get a "spontaneous" civil war.

 

Benghazi was tied to that–they were trying to get weapons from Libya shipped over via the ambassador that got killed there. Supposedly he knew too much–that's the explanation I've come across that seemed to make the most sense, at least.

 

It's an interesting dig that I left awhile back. But maybe this declass is a precursor to actual charges.

Anonymous ID: bb510d Feb. 28, 2020, 2:59 p.m. No.8278039   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8277899

I think some of us have gotten past that part of being here when Q posts. I used to want, more than anything else, to get a big (you) from him…but I came to realize that it will probably never happen.

 

Q's crumbs are dropped "future proves past" style; he's giving them to us, and we may or may not figure them out, but they cannot be confirmed until some media-worthy event shows them to be true–otherwise it would be leaking.

 

Nowadays, Q mostly gives (you)'s to people who spot the connection between current events and Q's past posts–the "proofs."

 

Personally, I dig because I want to know what's really going on and share it with my fellow anons…so I get right to figuring out what Q just told us. There have been times when, later on, Q has (you)'d someone that points out something I'd said months before, almost at the time he said it. It used to drive me crazy–I thought there must be something about me he didn't like. Now I understand (I hope).

 

I still feel like he's out there sometimes, giving us little winks and nudges without using his trip code. There have been other things in his posts that felt like nods.

 

Nowadays, I enjoy seeing him pop up because it's fresh dirt to dig…but it's also pretty annoying trying to get a deep idea out at those times, because everybody goes nuts ha ha.

Anonymous ID: bb510d Feb. 28, 2020, 3:06 p.m. No.8278104   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8278050

>During the 114th Congress (2015–2017), Ratcliffe sat on the Judiciary and Homeland Security committees, where he was a subcommittee chair on the House Homeland Security Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection, and Security Technologies. [52] [53] During the 115th Congress (2017–19), Ratcliffe was a member of the Ethics, Judiciary, and Homeland Security committees.[54] Within the Homeland Security Committee, he was a member of the subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency and chaired the subcommittee on Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Protection.[54] Within the Judiciary Committee, he was a member of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security and Investigations and vice chairman of the Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Commercial and Antitrust Law.[54]

 

>During the 116th Congress (2019–present), Ratcliffe currently sits on the Ethics, Judiciary and Intelligence Committees.[55] Within the Judiciary Committee, Ratcliffe is ranking member of the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security and a member of the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet.[55] Within the Intelligence Committee, Ratcliffe is a member of the Strategic Technologies and Advanced Research Subcommittee and Intelligence and Modernization Readiness Subcommittee.[55]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ratcliffe_(American_politician)

(note his prosecutorial experience as well)

 

Democrats are already talking about his lack of experience. There is one simple response: Brennan. If you can appoint a guy like that to head the fucking CIA–an admitted former Communist that grew up in the Middle East–you can appoint a patriot to be the DNI.