>>8277744 LB

>If they inevitably come here and aren't dealt with in an empathetic manner, it could be worse for the overall movement . . . . . .

Had you been here from the beginning you would know that there NEVER was an intent for ANYbody to bring a newbie here.

Your concerns show your newbie-ness.

The intent was from the start for this to be a research and compilation site to assemble information to be DISPERSED ELSEWHERE.

If you're bringing newbies here, you are doing it wrong.

Do you think the pocket pussy adverts will help your credibility with them?

FFS

>>8278679

My only point was that this was debated at great length in the beginning and obviously you were not here for those discussions.

The reasons for not bringing newbies here, FAR outweigh the reasons for maybe doing so.

This is largely why all the secondary sites are listed at the top of every bread.

Your lack of understanding has nothing to do with my being self righteous or the amount of love in the world.

Think Logically, if you can.