>>8278838 pb
>Ergonomic vertical mouse
Will check it out. Really like pens better than mice, but only work for graphics. Don't fully work for regular tasks. Think someone would make a fortune inventing a pen that's a fully functional mouse.
slightly!
never-ending bullshit
ha-ha-ha…..
They're really having fun.
>Can you give a description of what you're saying?
Yep. Reminds me, was gonna post this a few times (see #5).
"We are the News": Eight tips for creating notable posts
Draft 1, 2-28-20
1. Remember the five "W"s: ''Who, What, When, Where, Why/how.''
These are reporting basics. DATES are critical; plz always include.
2. Use RED TEXT & bold to call out notables.
This REALLY helps bakers locate worthy posts & avoid eye strain.
3. List article and video TITLES not just links.
Sauce on vids is usually non-existent, at least include a date + summary.
4. For tweets, copypasta the text (don't just cap them).
Qresear.ch is a great resource, but it's 100% text.
5. Use your words (not just diagrams) to describe your work on Q proofs, etc .
If you can't describe it, how is baker supposed to?
6. ''DATES, DATES, DATES.''
Shills post old but jazzy news, then cry 'clown baker' if notabled. Defeat them with dates.
7. If post is part of an ongoing dig, include the DIG name.
Bakers are on the lookout but don't know every dig.
8. Got an Apple phone with JPEG capture default? Then post text instead (links, title, date).
Easiest way to avoid the hassle of converting to PNG.
Not trying to boss anons around but just to support our work. Thoughts?
Anon, sorry but i didn't understand either. There are two problems with trying to make correlations.
-
showing that they are really not just chance.
-
showing that–assuming they are not just chance–they have implications that are important for anons to understand.
Both conditions must be met. When they are, they usually are nommed rapidly by other anons. When this is not true, it's up to the poster to make a good argument to support ideas. Saying "just put in this" is not an explanation. Baker doesn't just need words but also understanding.
Ah.
You don't really care, do you?
It's just the old "Clown baker on duty" routine.
Will save a good example of how a smart baker deals with a shill post.
Thank you.
"Baker stands firm."
How bad do you think we need Q proofs at this stage in the game? Give us a break. Proofs are fine, they serve a purpose. But i suspect that whether or not we defeat the cabal will not depend upon whether your fabulous proof (or anybody's) gets notabled.
>It´s obvious that this kind of proof has clowns terrified.
Yer really makin' me kek now. C'mon now, give it up!
The Best is Yet to Come!
The Best is Yet to Come!
The Best is Yet to Come!
Mystery baker, kek.
then you're not paying very close attention, are u?