>>8279813

Are you sure. Are you really sure that Burr and Warner would not have made such a bold statement to undercut the nomination (of Ratcliffe) WITHOUT approval from Mitch McConnell?

What if I tell you it was part of the plan? Part of the greatest sting ever in the history of mankind? Would you then, reconsider your position?

Anon's been away for a few hours. Long story. On top of everything, so much winning, President Trump nominates John Ratcliffe as his next Director of National Intelligence. Fredo's going crazy.

>>8280196

Have them appoint a Chinaman as CEO. We riding Indian bikes now.

>>8280310

Ain't no doubt about it in this anon's logic.

>>8280351

Got it anon. You are willing to reconsider. Good on you. The future will prove the past. #stay tuned

>>8280351

Hmmmmm. Is that you Sundance?