Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10 p.m. No.8281309   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1322 >>1441 >>1508

Two nights back I put up several posts related to the Las Vegas rally:

>>8260752 (pb)

Eight posts total, but the last is just a summary. Basically it seemed Q was giving some pointers to that rally, and then I found some glitches in the rally vid that POTUS posted that seemed to be comms, and one of them seemed to point to a meme post in a bread the same day that seemed to have multiple "unsigned" comms.

 

A few anons added useful info when I posted and I kept digging on this and I think I've found multiple additional comms connected to this rally and the vid and the bread.

 

For reference, here's the POTUS rally vid link:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1230979334237609984

He links this vid:

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1kvJpXzLLkdJE?t=7s

But its best to download the vid if you want to check this since it makes a difference that the glitches are in the vid and not in the streaming…

 

Also here's the place to "start" in the bread (Q Research General #10508: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming, Nothing! Edition):

>>8208266 (pb)

Cap posted.

I'm switching this from my post the other day, since Meme Farmer pointed out the better version of the meme, and I realized it also had the 1:57PM timestamp. (I had earlier used the version just above in the bread.) Meme repost is below…

Basically, the video had a "glitch" that showed a 1:57 PM timestamp and POTUS started off the rally by saying he was going back East, so I figured I'd try the bread at 1:57 Eastern time. All of that is in the prior set of posts.

 

I'm not sure on the "big picture" here… but wondering if these comms aren't the "carpet bombs". Anyway they all seem to stand or fall on their own - even though if many of them are legit they seem to fit together. Different anons "catch" different stuff so maybe Q team is tossing out multiple different angles at once? Anyone I've scarcely sorted out the stuff I'm posting and I've got other "leads" noted so I'll keep on it.

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:02 p.m. No.8281322   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1331 >>1508

>>8281309

Why not start here…

Anons caught this new Trump ad with a Q at 0:55.

Vid here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4dEpe6v7uY4

 

That's huge in itself. But one thing that might not be obvious from the ad is that this woman was sitting right behind POTUS at the Las Vegas rally with the same shirt.

But so far as I can tell, the shot in the ad must be from somewhere else - all the people around her are different it seems. Anyone know where that is from? Maybe that means something.

 

Also I noticed when I was putting those two shots side by side that the Screenshot of the Trump ad was HUGE… 3.21 Mb. Can't see why a cap of a YT vid would be so big…Maybe a countdown signal? Maybe Q posted and there are other comms in the pic post somehow.

Link to pic post:

>>8270337 (pb)

 

Anyway the vid highlighted the Miracle on Ice team, which seems to fit the "band of Pepes" theme of the White Squall meme (mentioned above).

 

Also 55 is also a marker for Q55 - the Storm tweet drop. Maybe these are comms telling us to prep for the Tweet?

 

Keep finding new stuff as I go, so haven't worked this all out… but it's all linked to the Vegas rally…

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:04 p.m. No.8281331   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1342 >>1508

>>8281322

Here's another thing from the Vegas rally itself… POTUS mentioned Gone with the Wind several times.

 

I knew that was a comm but didn't get it until I saw that Anons caught the JFK ref.

 

But later I remembered that POTUS had a twat about wind knocking down the wall, and it turns out he had another recent "wind" twat too…

 

They are both about wind applying force… but now check Q1643…. We might have to 'force' this one. Sounds like they're prepping for "the Q" and warning us to get ready.

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:06 p.m. No.8281342   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1348 >>1508

>>8281331

Next up… look at the screen cap.

You may have seen this post before at end of bread, but I think it could be a comm here.

It came at the end of the bread where I posted the Vegas stuff…

>>8261422 (pb)

 

Now obviously whoever came up with this is making a joke about "fill the bread"… but Q can use this post too.

Phil is on a red carpet >"red carpet rollout"

But look at the timestamp: 23:00:17.

And Groundhog Day suggests "rewatch the bread".. maybe Q is hinting that the Vegas posts are on track. For sure I've caught more stuff since I made that post.

 

And I caught one WHILE I was writing this very post. Wanted to include the original "red carpet rollout" post, but this turned up a "carpet bomb" post as well and it has a countdown starting on 21…. the date of the Vegas rally was Feb 21.

 

And just caught ANOTHER wind connect… but I'll include it below…

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:07 p.m. No.8281348   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1358 >>1779

>>8281342

After pb multi-post got several good replies from Anons, but one shill… almost blasted him but held back.

Must be one of their "better" shills as reply was VERY deceptive. I'll break it down in three posts…

 

Shill responded directly to this post:

>>8260859 (pb)

That's first cap and shill post is second. Graphic is from initial post and shill claims to be ID 8d15ad featured there.

I'm saying 8d15ad is giving comms and shill is saying no it was him and no comms.

 

Focus on how shill says he plays around with numbers and deltas and sometimes they don't work. Well take a look first at the middle part of the graphic, about the Kudlow Fox News vid. Let's think it out: the numbers there DO work.

 

Suppose POTUS posted a vid with someone saying BOOM six times. Then suppose an Anon linked the timestamp to a Q post that had a [6] and said COMMS GOOD. And suppose he made a graphic and posted. That's a NOTABLE and a likely Q proof. If you get that, you're tall enough to ride. What I'm saying here is true EVEN if you are NOT convinced by the rest of this post.

 

Now… it could STILL be a coincidence that the Anon who posted the Fox News vid highlighted the timestamp that links to the relevant Q post. But it IS a coincidence, since the numbers OBVIOUSLY WORK.

 

Or look at it another way… suppose you were the Anon who caught the numbers connection… you might WONDER if it is a real comm or just a coincidence… but you wouldn't think the numbers "don't work". Or if you had made the post with no idea about the numbers connection, you'd probably say you were noting the BOOMS but handn't noticed the deeper possible connect. You WOULDN'T claim to be playing around with numbers that didn't pan out…

 

Upshot: this might not be a proof that ID 8d15ad is posting comms, but the NUMBERS WORK, and the shill is obviously just trying to divert attention from this. Their tactic is just throw up smoke and hope no one ploughs through it. Conclusion: shill is a liar and didn't make this post.

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:09 p.m. No.8281358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1374

>>8281348

(can't repost shill post so look back one…)

Next… I pointed how the Kudlow Fox News vid had the filename: Larry_Kudlow_boom_boom_boom-iphonepod.mp4

I said this is obviously a fake filename that we are probably supposed to notice. Think how your files get names… either you DIRECTLY name them or you go with whatever name is provided, either some random name and some name with data built in, like a Screenshot-Feb 23-7:04.png. But if you're intentionally naming the file, you won't leave in part of the name that doesn't mean anything. But that is EXACTLY what whoever named this file did. The first part makes sense but the iphonepod part makes no sense FOR THIS VIDEO.

And in any case there is NO SUCH THING as an iphonepod. Those were two different products… iphone basically replaced ipod.

 

But the shill is claiming that he uses a video converter app that standardly appends iphonepod as an extension. OK, what app? If you were an actual anon trying to steer anons away from a pointless inquiry, wouldn't you give this info? I would… and I've done it before when I realized I made a mistake.

 

And look closely how the shill is twisting language. He is calling iphonepod an "extension"… everyone knows that EXTENSIONS are commonly appended to filenames. But these are the THREE character extensions at the END that indicate the file type! (the extension here is mp4) When your talking about filenames, EXTENSION is a TECHNICAL term. But the shill is calling the end of the main filename an extension and hoping no one is paying attention. I have NEVER seen an app that "appends" anything to the main part of a filename that you wrote yourself.

 

The upshot is that I think this filename was DELIBERATELY meant to be absurd so that we would catch it and dig further, but the shill is throwing up words to divert attention.

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:12 p.m. No.8281374   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1386

>>8281358

Finally you can see how the shill really gives away the game when you look at his comment on the "Hoover Dam" incident. This relates to another post by ID 8d15ad that simply includes a time calculation that made little sense. In the graphic that I reposted (two posts back), I pointed out how the second time in the caclulation was a few minutes IN THE FUTURE from the post time, so I thought this migth be a comm. But I couldn't figure out what the other dates/times meant.

 

But… the shill is saying that June 15 was the date of the "Hoover Dam" incident that the fake news is always mentioning. I checked and this is right…

 

Now think this out… I spend a lot of time on Q so I know some Q related dates and so do many anons… but one date I didn't know until now was the date of that Hoover Dam incident. I never paid much attention to it since it was OBVIOUS BS! But who would likely know that date VERY WELL… a shill! Maybe David Brock handed out a sheet of "fake facts" to tape over the monitor so they can drop'em into discussions on reddit etc to poison minds.

 

But… now that I'm thinking this out.. I think this dumbass has actually revealed a new meaning to the "delta" post by 8d15ad. The first time (June 15) marks the Hoover Dam incident, but maybe it is really meant to mark the Hoover Dam itself. And then the second time is a few minutes into the future from the post. So maybe this is a commm that means… the DAM is about to burst!

 

I think this MORAN shill has actually revealed another piece of the comms.

(Also, gotta say I hope the truth comes out about Pat Tillman….)

 

Added: wrote all that last night but didn't post and now today found another link here. Was searching for "wind" on qmap and found Q3573. That's from the day Q returned after the shutdown. (Anons bitch about qmap titles but here it helped…) The vid is just a flag waving, but the timestamp is 4:28 and matches the timestamp in the mysterious delta post. Also think wind theme matches water/dam theme.. big FORCE coming? Tryin to get these posts out so not gonna flesh this angle right now…

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:14 p.m. No.8281386   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1394

>>8281374

Recap: sketching out possible set of comms related to Vegas rally, POTUS-posted vid of Vegas rally, and Q Research General #10508: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming, Nothing! Edition (possibly linked by the vid).

 

Next up… moar possible comms from vid:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1230979334237609984

 

First, if you actually go to that link and then click on the pscp.tv link, it is actually an abbreviated link, but it resolvse to:

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1kvJpXzLLkdJE?t=7s

 

You see at the end how the vid is being set to start at 7 seconds in… however there is really no reason for this that I can see, at least when it come to the video itself. However it can make sense as a comm.. after 7 comes 8, as in 8kun… maybe a signal to be ready?

 

I think this fits with the other stuff I put in the graphic. First there is a woman in the vid who at one point is holding up a phone and suddenly green lights are flashing on the back. It is very obvious when you see it in the vid (and then the green lights switch to many colors… not sure what it means). Of course it might mean nothing but I can see how this woman could "part of the show". She could have been signalled on her phone to put it up in a certain direction… who knows? Anyway it fits, just tossin it out. At least it fits with the timestamp at the very end of the vid, 2:05PM. I connected this with Q206 which has "Can't wait for the green light".

 

I think this can fit with the link timestamp. Maybe 8kun is being readied for "the green light"…

 

Now obviously the worldwide Q army if far bigger than 8kun but the anons who really get the comms are here so we need to interpret and relay to others…

 

Anyway take it or leave it… moar next…

 

(Also, forgot this at first… another green light "glitch" at 1:07:01 in vid…)

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:15 p.m. No.8281394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1402

>>8281386

Here is another glitch in the vid. At 1:07:07 a glitch bar crosses POTUS at the eyes and then disappears, all within that timestamp. (Don't know enough about how video works to say if that particular glitch "makes sense"…)

 

Anyway it is very INTERDASTING that it hits him right on the eyes when 1:07 is the Dark to Light marker…

 

Also check out the set of posts involving 107… (you can see the post nums in the qmap link but they don't show visually so I added)

 

The marker comes from the moment in the yt vid when there is literally dark to light (NK vid)

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.8281402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1414 >>1422 >>1455

>>8281394

Now jumping to possible comms IDs in Q Research General #10508: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming, Nothing! Edition…

(several discussed already… see above)

 

First up is this one shot poster

>>8208374 (pb)

The poster only posted the vid embed with two birds singing… Birds cap image…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqdRQxgtZtI

 

This post is at 14:07, ten minutes after 13:57 (1:57 PM) the time of a White Squall meme post, and the time linked to the Vegas rally vid. (Go back up for more on this)

Two birds, 5+5=10… 5:5?

 

Q has many posts that ask: When does a bird sing?

The common answer is: after a storm

The bird post is literally after the White Squall meme.

 

I posted one of those posts - Q391 - since it features a 22 (and I think Q sometimes uses Singapore as a marker for singing). Feb 22 is the next day after the day of these posts.

 

That is all very interdasting… but I figured I should look further. I check the length of the video… 1:52 and checked Q152.

It features the Thank You Asia video that POTUS twatted… and remembered that one literally has a Q red carpet rollout in it. You can see the Q there.

Thank You Asia! twat/vid:

https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/930490487903084544

 

And the Vegas rally was the last before POTUS went on a high-profile trip to…. Asia!

 

(Also clicked through the bird link to check the day of the vid… didn't see anything for sure there…)

 

Take it or leave it… I think this could be a comm…

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:19 p.m. No.8281414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1421 >>1435

>>8281402

Next check out ID 115540 from the same bread…

>>8207853 (pb)

The first post is the WATCHTHEWATERSTORM meme posted in response to the first White Squall meme post.

 

The ID has 17 posts. Sixteen are memes and fifteen are Pepe memes, with the other being overly ABOUT memes (Wayne). The non-meme post is an o7.

 

The ID is all numerals. The chance of a six digit hex number being all numerals is (10/16)^6 = 6%… not that low but still…

 

The middle two digits are 55. VERY INTERDASTING.

 

Now take the remaining digits: 11 40. Check Q 1140.

 

It's about… MEMES!

 

Again… take it or leave it… is this comms or just a whole bunch of coincidences?

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:21 p.m. No.8281421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1428

>>8281414

Now I'm on to the last coincidence cluster for now. Once you "see it" I think it is obvious but it is VERY hard to "see" at first since I think there are two different IDs working in cahoots and exploiting "convention" in a very tricky way.

To understand the coincidence, you need to think about how 8kun works with media filenames. You don't need to know the backend (which I know nothing about) just what is obvious once you think it out. I've gotten confused on this myself at times.

 

I grabbed a meme from a recent bread and saved it four times. (Actually had it the other day but figured its a good example…) Can you figure out what I did each time? Probably.

 

The first one I saved using the meaningful filename. For the second one I did the same exact thing again. My system recognized that I had a file with that very name and offered to rename it by appending the (1) at the end. But now you can see that even though I uploaded them with different names, 8kun has given them the SAME 8kun "hash filename". I presume this is to save space… both of the meaningful names will point to the exact same file on the 8kun server… not merely the same data, the SAME FILE.

 

Now look at the third image. You can figure out that I must have downloaded the image using the "hash filename" and then uploaded it with that name. So… 8kun gives THAT SAME hash filename to the image: the upload filename and the hash filename are the same. You see this all the time right?

 

Now look at the fourth image. You can figure out what I must have done. The upload filename JUST IS the hash filename with a (1) at the end. So you can surmise that I probably downloaded the file using the hash filename for a SECOND time, and my system offered to give it that modified name. And you'd be right. That is exactly what happened. But when I upload the file with the modified hash name, 8kun recognizes the image and just gives it the original hash filename.

 

Now for the fun… what if you SAW a filename that LOOKED like an 8kun has name, but it had a (1) at the end, but it DIDN'T map to the "unmodified" version of the hash? Realistically, you'd do nothing. I'd probably do nothing too. I'd probably figure it just looked like an 8kun hash but wasn't. Even if I counted the number of chars I couldn't PROVE it was an 8kun hash, right?

 

Except… there IS an EASY way to prove something IS an 8kun hash filename… just try to load the file from the 8kun server.

 

Compare these two links for the first image:

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/8d350282faa5618c7898a4d3d33c8095230325600f1e7d311a65efde6c68ec04.png

https://media.8kun.top/file_dl/8d350282faa5618c7898a4d3d33c8095230325600f1e7d311a65efde6c68ec04.png/Redhead7_forGod_Q_Flag.png

 

Think how this likely works. The first likely goes DIRECTLY to an image file with the given name. But where that same hash name occurs in the second link, it must be the name of a DIRECTORY that contains LINKS to the prior file. What about:

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/Redhead7_forGod_Q_Flag.png

That gets a 404, since the filename is NOT an 8kun hash filename.

 

So… if a file loads when the name is appended to https://media.8kun.top/file_store/ then it IS an 8kun hash filename. No need to calculate probabilities!

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:23 p.m. No.8281428   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1441

>>8281421

Now look at these two caps, but really go look at the posts. The second is part of the discussion generated by the first meme.

 

>>8207830 (pb)

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/46edcf9d25d5110cea18f8575557be4770460b80ccf2343ad91e2c066114cb46.png

 

https://media.8kun.top/file_dl/46edcf9d25d5110cea18f8575557be4770460b80ccf2343ad91e2c066114cb46.png/027fe68a4308224ee6fadff69c5c73bebf15b0816c366d2dd22262afdb4ad2ef_(1).png

 

These are the two links for the meme, copied from the post. Both include the hash filename as part of the link. If you want a real AHA! moment STOP and look at the second link and THINK. WHAT is wrong with it? Or rather what SEEMS to be wrong with it?.

 

The second cap has the "Anon" quite reasonably expecting to find the original filename by stripping off the (1)

>>8208169 (pb)

https://media.8kun.top/file_store/027fe68a4308224ee6fadff69c5c73bebf15b0816c366d2dd22262afdb4ad2ef.png

 

What's the problem?

What's your conclusion?

Maybe I'll just leave it like that for the moment. It took me hours to work this out because it is SO deceptive, and I thought I was trying to figure out something else entirely. It won't take nearly that long to grasp what is going on if you fully grasp the prior post.

 

TIP: you DON'T need to be an ubercodefag to get this. I am not.

 

Well I will say that my conclusion is that both of those IDs are Q team and that the POINT of this is to highlight this overall set of hidden commms.

Anonymous ID: fb02bf Feb. 28, 2020, 10:26 p.m. No.8281441   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1508

>>8281428

Final post recap:

This set of posts is a followup on a set of posts several nights back:

>>8260752 (pb)

It started up here:

>>8281309

Almost all of the posts are INDEPENDENT but they are all meant to point to possible comms within an interconnected whole that relates:

1) Q pointers to the Las Vegas rally as comm heavy, and then the rally itself

2) the VIDEO of the rally that POTUS linked:

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1230979334237609984

 

3) a bread the same day that the video "points to":

Q Research General #10508: Nothing Can Stop What is Coming, Nothing! Edition

"Starting point" in that bread:

>>8208266 (pb)

Haven't worked out if I think that is actual anon or Q team but maybe best starting point nonetheless.

 

Sorry for scattershot approach.. seems to be TON of stuff here and trying to get it out so others can go at it….