Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 10:58 a.m. No.8284389   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Where did Neon Revolt get his Q hit piece list in the Hotwheels article?

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2020/02/27/breaking-exclusive-fredrick-brennan-hw_beat_that-goes-fugitive-as-playboy-readies-to-attack-8kun-more-surprises-in-store-for-fred-from-the-feds-qanon-greatawakening-neonrevolt/

(Hint: three guesses, first two don't count…..)

 

In Neon Revolt's recent piece on hotwheels, he includes a list of anti-Q hit pieces and says that there are over 1500 of them. Last night on the board, anons were asking where they came from:

 

>>8282125

Just read this Neon Revolt post that was noted by CM through Praying Medic about Hotwheels’ shenanigans.

(Nasty little troll that he shows himself to be.)

What’s his beef with the Watkins?

I know the history but why the vitriol?

Why the overt reaction to the point of allegedly breaking the law?

Attached is Neon Revolts >>8284245

list of Q hit pieces by the ever loving MSM. A lot bigger than the last list that was posted.

Is there a list of Q non hit pieces?

You know, for comparison.

—————

After I finished KEKKING for about a minute……

Coz NOBODY recognized them…..thought maybe I should say.

This list comes from HERE.

It gets posted every two months (a new one's due out in about a week to 10 days). Kudos to NR for NOT revealing the source–thus not garnering additional negative attention from the MSM.

Attached is a readable list of hit pieces thru Dec 31 2019.

 

Here's the answer to anon's question:

>Is there a list of Q non hit pieces?

Not really.

Not really. That's because the original intent was to find out what the MSM was writing about Q and who was writing it. But also, it soon became apparent that pubs which might be sympathetic to Q (Breitbart or Epoch Times) remained silent. Until now, they have had to be in order to retain their credibility. American Thinker is very unusual in having one pretty positive piece prior to the end the Dec, along with a couple more recent ones that aren't on the Dec 31 list (one of which was reprinted by ZH).

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 11:03 a.m. No.8284452   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4487

>>8284407

Baker, great work.

Not sure if you're a new baker or just someone who never ghosts because you bake days.

BUT

if you really have to go, Baker Leaving the Kitchen, request a note-taker, and declare GHOST BAKE.

o7

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 11:27 a.m. No.8284735   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4761

>>8284657

>healing up

hey fren i'm workin on it….

but not ready for a day bake yet

fast typey under time pressure

perfect storm. savin' up, will try a baker tonite…as u know

 

hey….i got this cool new meme.

something about a disco party…..

like it?

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 11:38 a.m. No.8284852   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4892 >>4948

>>8284742

this is another baker.

all bakers are different in how they handle notables. But one thing i will say: trying to gather all the news during the day is very tough. Helps if anons take some of the responsibility. What can you do? Nom posts you think are notables. make sure they are current (not two years old), check qresear.ch if possible, and "package" them, e.g.:

 

>>8284393 Amazon tells its ~800,000 employees to halt travel over coronavirus fears

notable

not in qresear.ch

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

and yes i am really nomming this one!!

 

—————

If anons do not do this, bakers must. And it takes a lot of time and typing/mousing. The more anons contribute, the more bakers can do as well.

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 11:51 a.m. No.8284969   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4993

>>8284892

>old news can be valuable

Yes, you are right. Both anons and bakers usually know when an "old" doc is relevant.

Here is the problem: old shill trick is to insert an article that LOOKS like it could have come out recently but is several years old and has no date in the link. Busy baker puts it in notables, then another shills (or IP-hopper) calls baker out saying article is old.

SOLUTION:

Always put DATES on everything but especially old stuff. Baker will then set it up something like this:

 

>>1450350 Reminder: Pelosi says, We need to talk about border security with the WH (2008)

[THIS IS COMPLETELY MADE UP EXAMPLE]

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 11:55 a.m. No.8285002   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5058

>>8284948

>bakers are busy

One reason bakers encourage "everybody to learn to bake" isn't just to have more bakers. It's so anons know what it's like to bake. I've had replies to sauce requests indicating baker was too lazy to get it himself. Would love to see that anon bake just once, kek.

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, noon No.8285037   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8285008

Anon, the poster really needs to include a description. No baker can look at a post like that and evaluate it properly. That is the poster's job. Ok if he doesn't wish to do more, but it won't get notabled without a clear description explaining what is shows and why it matters. USE BOLD, CAPS, or RED TEXT to call attention to it.

Anonymous ID: 979e97 Feb. 29, 2020, 12:03 p.m. No.8285066   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8285001

ha-ha-ha

definitely no missile was shot from Mercer Island

it's where the rich people live in the middle of Lake Washington

yeah, could use a correction.