Anonymous ID: 9396a5 Feb. 29, 2020, 12:48 p.m. No.8285442   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8284472 (lb)

I don't think you understood what caused what you think you're seeing, here. If there were X-amount of 12,000 year cycles, how many major changes would we expect to see in our natural world? Think about that for a second…

 

Okay. Now, think about your association of these cycles with the "pole flip". The last pole flip, so they say, happened roughly 700,000 years ago, based off their interpretations. That's nearly 60 cycles worth of missing "pole flips". Funny how that works, huh? So, either these are two separate "phenomena" entirely, or we are misinterpreting data, somewhere along the way, if not in multiple regions.

 

We do see changes that occurred over time. But it doesn't really correlate with distinct 12,000 year cycles. The typically correlate with mass extinctions, which we have yet to accurately identify the root cause of. At this point, anything proposed will be theory, at best, because none of us were around to actually witnessed what took place to cause what it did. There's really no denying that. That means, anything I state is no more definite than what you state, and regardless of how many people believe one thing or another, there is only one truth. The Truth doesn't need our interpretations, it just is. And actually, if you want to refer to what we have available, with the many accounts of "mythology" from around the world, it doesn't really support the 12,000 year cycle theory either, since, according to our "official" timelines, 12,000 years ago is when we were supposedly just coming out of the "ice age", and that's the supposed reason why civilization advanced to what we know today (again according to "official" theory). And even in the archeological records, we see plenty of destruction that occurs in the last few thousand years, long after the last supposed "cycle" would've occurred. Doesn't jive…

 

Anyway, back to life. It's reasonable to conclude that intense bombardments of radioactivity are a likely catalyst for rapid advancement of life we see in the "fossil record". One thing not often emphasized is that our "fossil record" is far from complete, insanely chaotic, and probably wouldn't even exist if not for extreme conditions that brought about mass destruction, etc. The strata doesn't show 12,000 year cycles. It's often random things piled high, etched away, turned over, twisted warped, etc. Some of these features I'd highly doubt can be explained by a simple blast from our sun.

 

Take the moon for instance. One claim is that there are "fission tracks" on the moon, which came from these "micronova" blasts. Problem. Why does the side of the moon that faces Earth look way moar damaged than the far side? If these features were caused by "cycles" where the source is a "micronova" from the sun, they would be moar likely to show on any side other than the side facing our planet, since that type of direct blow would be at least partially shielded by Earth in that configuration. Just doesn't add up.

 

I could do this all day, and I've done it before. 12,000 year "Micronava" cycle is an interesting theory, but it has many a flaw. I remain incredibly skeptical. Especially, since I know enough about the people who put it together. First off, that guy Doug Vought (spelling might be off), happens to also promote holographic universe theories. Typical clown misinformation, IMHO. He doesn't seem smart, and completely ignores Electric Universe type ideology. Second, Ben. Suspicious 0bservers guy. While he seems smart, and does link some good shit every now and then, he's degrees are in marketing. He's approaching this from a business perspective, not a scientific. He's also really full of himself, on a side note, but that's not as important. Point is, his "micronova" "cycle" thing has been sold to the masses from a "fear porn" marketing perspective. If he's right, what does he win? We all die, so none knows any better anyway. Maybe you can be "prepared", but that just goes back into marketing aspects. Now, you're psychologically invested into his "product" until that "micronova" actually happens. But if it doesn't, where's the accountability? When do we call off the wait? We're already 700,000 years overdue for our "pole flip". So, does that mean it's gonna happen any day now? Or maybe, as I said, perhaps they really don't yet understand what really took place, which is why so many wild theories are floating around that can't immediately be shot down, because we have yet to pin point the exact causes.