Q/Q+ plans to win all 538 Electoral College votes for Donald J. Trump in 2020.

This is becoming undeniable.

All the states Trump lost in 2016 except the 5 states Virginia, Maine, Nevada, New Hampshire and Minnesota have already enacted laws to award all their electoral votes to the winner of the national popular vote.

And 3 of those 6, Virginia, New Hampshire and Minnesota are in the process of passing national popular vote laws.

That only leaves Maine and Nevada for Trump to pick up in 2020 in order to win all 538 Electoral College votes, if he wins the national popular vote.

But that's impossible, right? Actually, it might be quite easy.

Scenario #1: Trump wins with 50.3% of the national popular vote

1. Hillary will again be the Democrat nominee

2. Give all Gary Johnson and Evan McMuffin's 2016 votes to Trump

3. Give all Jill Stein's 2016 votes to Hillary

4. Split all other votes between Trump and Hillary

5. No drop in enthusiasm or turnout for either candidate

6. Trump wins Maine, Nevada and all states he won in 2016

7. Virginia, New Hampshire and Minnesota pass national popular vote laws

8. Trump wins all 538 Electoral College votes

Scenario #2: Trump wins with 54.7% of the vote

1. Scenario #2 builds on Scenario #1

2. Hillary will again be the Democrat nominee

3. Enthusiasm for Hillary drops by 6 million votes

4. Enthusiasm for Trump increases by 6 million votes

5. Trump wins Maine, Nevada and all states he won in 2016

6. Virginia, New Hampshire and Minnesota pass national popular vote laws

7. Trump wins all 538 Electoral College votes

Scenario #2: Trump wins with 60.6% of the vote

1. Scenario #3 builds on Scenario #2

2. Hillary will again be the Democrat nominee

3. DHS/NSA prevent 8 million electronic voting machine votes being flipped

4. Trump wins Maine, Nevada and all states he won in 2016

5. Virginia, New Hampshire and Minnesota pass national popular vote laws

6. Trump wins all 538 Electoral College votes

Note: The enthusiasm gap is assumed to be due to 1) Trump's economic performance as president, 2) Hillary's low profile and likeability quotient, and 3) Much lower social media company involvement in electioneering (Google is accused of switching up to 10 million votes to Hillary through electioneering search results alone)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_elections

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/08/on-election-day-most-voters-use-electronic-or-optical-scan-ballots/

>>8286959

Soros Voting Machine drops

Who decides what voter machines are used in elections?

https://qmap.pub/read/121

Podesta Pre-Programming Voting Machines

https://qmap.pub/read/574

Removal of electoral college [pop vote ^easier manipulation/illegal votes/Soros machines]

https://qmap.pub/read/570

What About Voting Machines?

https://qmap.pub/read/153

Who Owns Poll Machines?

https://qmap.pub/read/111

>>8286959

August 19, 2015

How Google Could Rig the 2016 Election

Google has the ability to drive millions of votes to a candidate with no one the wiser.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548

September 8, 2019

Dr. Robert Epstein: Study claims Google reflected 'very dramatic bias' in 2016 election search results

https://www.foxnews.com/media/google-bias-search-results-trump-clinton-epstein-levin

""That level of bias was sufficient, I calculated, to have shifted over time somewhere between 2.6 and 10.4 million votes to Hillary without anyone knowing that this had occurred," he claimed."

>>8286959

Notice how so many Red States began the process of enacting national popular vote laws, and then….and then nearly all of them appear to be dragging their feet and not so sure and maybe we won't after all…

Brilliant.

That's called good bait.

>>8286959

I think Trump and the generals actually want to get rid of the electoral college eventually, during a Constitutional Convention in Trump's second term.

A 538 to 0 result in 2020 really does help make that case.

And then, it is much easier to nationalize federal elections and require all states and counties to use a single voting process approved the federal government, not George Soros.

>>8287325

thank you for this