Anonymous ID: d249a0 Feb. 29, 2020, 9:01 p.m. No.8289359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9429 >>9558 >>9562 >>9612

John Ratcliffe says 'experienced' intelligence officials 'have gotten it wrong' in defense of renewed spy chief bid

 

Rep. John Ratcliffe said his "different kind of experience" makes him a strong candidate for President Trump's top intelligence official. The Texas Republican, who is being renominated to be the director of national intelligence, took on criticisms he faces as he explained why he is "absolutely" qualified at a time when the United States deals with national security threats such as the spread of the new coronavirus and another potential wave of Russian election interference, saying, "I’ve been handling national security issues as far back as 2005.” "I haven't served in an intelligence agency. I think that bringing a different kind of experience today is really going to be vitally important. You know all of the experience in the world isn't helpful without judgment, and I think what we've seen is that some of our most experienced intelligence officials have gotten it wrong with respect to important issues," Ratcliffe told Catherine Herridge of CBS News.

 

His critique aligns with complaints by Trump, who has a history of breaking with intelligence assessments by his own agencies, and who has castigated top former officials who investigated his 2016 presidential campaign. Ratcliffe has been a leading voice in demanding accountability over allegations of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses by the Justice Department and the FBI.

 

Trump initially nominated Ratcliffe to replace Dan Coats as the director last summer, but the congressman withdrew within days after some senators questioned his credentials and he was accused of overstating his professional record regarding the prosecution of Hamas terrorists. “I reconsidered because the president asked me, and I think when the president asks you to do something for your country, you look at that,” Ratcliffe said. “I think I’ll have the support of all Republicans at the end of the day. I’m going to work hard to convince at least some of my Democratic colleagues on the other side of the aisle.”

 

After Trump announced late Friday that he was renominating Ratcliffe, Democrats quickly fired off fresh complaints. "Replacing one highly partisan operative with another does nothing to keep our country safe. At a time when the Russians are interfering in our elections, we need a nonpartisan leader at the helm of the Intelligence Community who sees the world objectively and speaks truth to power, and unfortunately, neither acting Director Grenell nor Rep. Ratcliffe comes even close to that," Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement. Trump defended his selection of Ratcliffe on Saturday, praising him as a “terrific man” during a wide-ranging news conference about the coronavirus earlier on Saturday. “He’s been fantastic at everything he’s done,” Trump added

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/john-ratcliffe-says-experienced-intelligence-officials-have-gotten-it-wrong-in-defense-of-renewed-spy-chief-bid

 

The president said Ratcliffe wanted him to hold off on a renomination to the top spy perch until after DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s FISA report had been released, which happened in December. “He wanted to wait until after the IG report,” Trump told reporters. “The IG report has now come, and we’ve learned a lot of very bad things from the IG report, as you know very well.” The president also predicted Ratcliffe will be confirmed by the Senate, which is controlled by Republicans. “I think he’ll go through a process, and I think it’ll go fairly quickly. He’s a very respected man, somebody that I’ve gotten to like, somebody who really has — he’s someone who has really distinguished himself, I think, over the last year and a half or two years in particular,” Trump said. “So, we’re very happy with that.”

Anonymous ID: d249a0 Feb. 29, 2020, 9:21 p.m. No.8289479   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9562 >>9612

Ukraine investigators open case into Joe Biden's role in firing of top prosecutor

 

Ukrainian investigators have begun an inquiry into then-Vice President Joe Biden over allegations that he pressured officials into firing a top prosecutor in 2016. A case revolving around Biden, now a Democratic candidate for president, was opened by the State Bureau of Investigations on a court order following a January appeal for action by Viktor Shokin, the dismissed prosecutor general's lawyer, Oleksandr Teleshetsky, told the Washington Post. “They need to investigate this. They have no other alternative. They are required to do this by the decision of the court. If they don't, then they violate a whole string of procedural norms,” Teleshetsky said. The State Bureau of Investigations confirmed an inquiry was opened. The case mentions only a U.S. citizen and does not refer to Biden by name.

 

Daria Kaleniuk, director of Ukraine’s Anti-Corruption Action Center, downplayed the significance of the matter, saying that Ukrainian law requires state investigators to open a case on a court order even if they don't believe there is enough evidence. “If I was a SBI investigator, I would close that case immediately,” she said.

 

Shokin, who was dismissed in March 2016 after about a year in office by then-President Petro Poroshenko, claims he was ousted because he wanted to investigate the lucrative role Hunter Biden, the son of Joe Biden, had on the board of Ukrainian energy company Burisma Holdings. President Trump, his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani, and other allies also claim Biden improperly used his position as vice president to pressure Ukraine to fire Shokin to protect his son from an investigation into Burisma. The elder Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees if Ukraine did not fire its top prosecutor, who was criticized by the West for not doing enough to crack down on corruption. The European Union, the International Monetary Fund, and other allies had the same objective, and Biden was repeating U.S. policy that had been set out by Washington’s ambassador to Kyiv in the preceding months and was briefed by White House staff just ahead of the trip.

 

Biden says there is no "credibility" to the claims of corruption, but his critics have seized on video of a statement the former vice president made in January 2018, where he boasted to members of a panel hosted by the Council of Foreign Relations that he ordered the Ukrainian government to fire Shokin or the White House would renege on a commitment to provide aid. “I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch. He got fired," Biden said.

 

The matter got wrapped up into the impeachment saga after Trump pressed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and other Democrats in a July 25 phone call in which he also appeared to praise Shokin and call his removal "unfair," according to a transcript released by the White House. Democrats cried foul over what they interpreted to be a "quid pro quo." At issue was whether the president improperly pressured Ukraine to announce investigations by withholding military aid and dangling the possibility of a White House meeting between the Trump and Zelensky. Trump was impeached by the Democratic-controlled House on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress, but he was acquitted by the GOP-led Senate earlier this month. Zelensky himself has repeatedly stated that he felt no pressure from Trump to open an investigation into the Bidens

 

Earlier this month, Zelensky fired his chief of staff and replaced him with Andriy Yermak, an aide who met with Giuliani, who also met with Shokin as far back as late 2018 as he sought political dirt on the Bidens.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/ukraine-investigators-open-case-into-joe-bidens-role-in-firing-of-top-prosecutor

Anonymous ID: d249a0 Feb. 29, 2020, 9:36 p.m. No.8289583   🗄️.is 🔗kun

'Seriously people': Surgeon general urges public to 'stop buying masks' for coronavirus

 

The Trump administration is advising the public to stop buying medical masks amid the coronavirus outbreak. U.S. Surgeon General Jerome Adams warned on Saturday that widespread purchases by average citizens of the masks creates a burden on healthcare providers. "Seriously people- STOP BUYING MASKS!" a tweet from the surgeon general's verified Twitter account said. "They are NOT effective in preventing general public from catching #Coronavirus, but if healthcare providers can’t get them to care for sick patients, it puts them and our communities at risk!"

 

As coronavirus fears have spiked in the United States, medical masks have begun to run out in some cities. The spread of the infection has caused the stock market to suffer its worst week since the 2008 financial crisis. The Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped nearly 4% at its close on Friday, and the S&P 500 dropped more than 3%. The warning from the surgeon general came on the same day Washington state confirmed the first death from the COVID-19 virus in the U.S.

 

President Trump said the person who died from the coronavirus was in their 50s and was a high-risk patient. Officials said the risk to the American public at large remains low. "The average American does not need to go out and buy a mask," Vice President Mike Pence, who was appointed to lead the administration's response to coronavirus, told reporters at the White House. Trump said 22 patients in the U.S. have coronavirus, including four who are "very ill." This is in addition to the 44 cases from the Diamond Princess cruise ship.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/seriously-people-surgeon-general-urges-public-to-stop-buying-masks-for-

 

https://twitter.com/Surgeon_General/status/1233725785283932160