Q !!mG7VJxZNCI Wed 12 Sep 2018 20:44:35 No.233

How do you demonstrate 'reasonable cause' to regulate and/or break up BIG TECH?

What is the common theme/tactic of the LEFT?

Define 'Fascism'.

Forcible suppression of opposition?

Define 'Censorship'.

The institution, system, or practice of censoring?

Define 'Narrative'.

A way of presenting or understanding a situation or series of events that reflects and promotes a particular point of view or set of values?

Define 'Projection'.

The attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects; especially : the externalization of blame, guilt, or responsibility as a defense against anxiety?

The forming of a plan : scheming?

Define 'Psychological Projection'.

A theory in psychology in which the human ego defends itself against unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others?

Define 'Narcissist'.

A person who has an excessive interest in or admiration of themselves: narcissists who think the world revolves around them | narcissists preening themselves in front of the mirror?

Define 'Dogma'.

A point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds?

Define 'Aggression'.

Forceful and sometimes overly assertive pursuit of one's aims and interests?

Define 'Suppression'.

The action of suppressing something such as an activity or publication?

[Bonus Round]

'Narcissists' are renowned for using 'psychological projection' to blame other people, even when it is entirely apparent that they are the ones in the wrong.

——————————–

Define 'Realism'.

The quality or fact of representing a person, thing, or situation accurately or in a way that is true to life?

[Realism]

Actions of [ANTIFA]:

-Aggression (Projection)

-Suppression (Fascism)

-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)

Actions of [FAKE NEWS]:

-Aggression (Projection)

-Suppression (Fascism)

-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)

Actions of [TWITTER, FB, GOOG, YT, REDDIT, etc..]:

-Aggression (Projection)

-Suppression (Fascism)

-Censorship (Narrative-Dogma)

BOMBS AWAY!

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-11/sessions-is-said-to-be-open-to-probe-of-social-media-giants

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/08/31/hey-google-facebook-twitter-trumps-got-point-need-to-do-better-job-self-regulating.html

MASSIVE FAKE NEWS ATTENTION FOR A 'CONSPIRACY' REDDIT BOARD BEING BANNED?

WHY ARE WE BEING TARGETED BY SOME OF THE LARGEST MEDIA ORGANIZATIONS ON THE PLANET?

Q !xowAT4Z3VQ Fri 06 Apr 2018 17:05:43 4faef7 No.924224

>>924151

Your trust & faith in us is enough.

You elected us to do the heavy lifting.

Enjoy the show.

BIRTH of a NEW NATION.

NEW WORLD.

Q

>>8292236

>>8292225

Can it be an allusion to cannibalism, done by the Deep State? These people are sick!

>>8292241

No. I am firmly convinced that EVERYthing POTUS does is intentional. He's the most intentional person ever witnessed.

Q !UW.yye1fxo Sat 03 Mar 2018 23:18:43 85cc02 No.544247

Where we go one, we go ALL.

Misspellings matter.

Sentence formation matters.

Learn.

Q

Every nuance of expression, punctuation, vocabulary choice, grammatical error, spelling error, capitalization, numerals used, etc. – these are ALL intentional and contain COMMS for those with eyes to see. Some of the comms is for us and some is presumably for others.

notable

>>8292257 Rep Gohmert Blows Death Of Obama Whistleblower Sky High: ‘He Was Gonna Name Names of People That Put This Country At Risk… & He Ends With a Bullet In Him?’

>>8292258

Believe it to be a shill, anon. Tried having a dialog and all it wants to do it steer the conversation into areas of its choosing. Also the misspelling was corrected by anon in days past, but they prefer to keep misspelling. Sign of a shill. Decided to ignore them from now on since they are so recognizable.

>>8292281 Allow me to repost, for sake of our weekend visitors.

HOW TO QUICKLY SPOT A CLOWN

They will:

• Attempt to get a divisive or emotional response from you, to derail research

• Concern-troll and copy/pasta spam shill to contradict confirmed findings

• Employ faux debate tactics: Generalizations, gas-lighting, projection, misdirection, false equivalences, confusing correlation with causation, appeal to authority, transference, false precepts, personal attacks, straw-men, red herrings, etc.

• Promote social ethics that are disingenuous like doxxing, "reverse psychology", or promoting propaganda

• Promote tactics that are unethical, illegal or involve violence outside the scope of the law

• Act as hall monitors or pretend to be an authority on what is or is not acceptable (don't let anybody tell you what is acceptable – evaluate everything for yourself, including this post)

• Employ Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt (FUD) to dissuade research

• Have fake arguments among multiple IDs attempting to inject an ad hominem emotional character to the bread

Topic Sliding: If information of a sensitive nature has been posted, they try to quickly remove it from public view by topic-sliding – submitting many unrelated posts to dilute information that they hope you won't notice. Operators can control several fake IDs via bots. They also use bots to mask their intent. Although the sensitive information wasn't censored, it is now lost in a sea of unrelated and bogus posts.

Seeding Bad Information: Operatives insert flawed or bogus information from time to time as an ongoing tactic, depending on their skill-set and mission needs. A common ruse is providing information backed by bad evidence, in the hope that you don't check the "source of the source." This serves several objectives: resource consumption, evidence pollution, discouragement and misdirection.

Astroturfing Consensus: Attempts to build a manufactured consensus around a flawed premise or compromised information. Related to consensus cracking, where false evidence is injected to dispute or discredit the current consensus, and push it towards a desired false consensus. Misleading and false evidence and information are often salted into the evidence pool, aiming to impede organic consensus building, while also poisoning the available information and evidence.

Cultivating Tacit Approval ('Silent Agreement'): This technique tries to convince users to ignore, or not respond to, bad information or false assertions. The goal is to reduce pushback against the above-mentioned tactics. This tactic weaponizes the board's own reply-filtering mechanism against anons, by persuading us to employ software filters, so we won't actively dispute operators seeding of bad information and astroturfing consensus. This is why operators try to condition users into filtering material they disagree with.

Dealing with Clown Bots

IF YOU DECIDE TO DIRECTLY ENGAGE A BOT, KNOW THIS:

Responding just wastes bread with their responses, and hands them a target to programmatically lock onto without handler interaction. One way to foil bots is to point them out by proxy: copy/paste the bot's ID as a quoted reference, while intentionally breaking its post link in your response, and/or answering it with a meme until they start misfiring because they can't parse the response to lock onto a target correctly. This can also make the bots look artificially erratic and easier for other anons to spot.

What Is Known About Clown Bots

• Facilitate topic sliding, manufacturing consensus, obfuscation of intent, and general disruption

• Require a handler to watch for and be in the thread

• Cannot enter threads themselves

• Respond to replies and each other, and can create replies

• Activate on lists of trigger words which change over time

• Use a combination of legit pasta, pre-written points, or spam targeted at various objectives

• Have unwittingly pasta'd supportive replies

• Are employed mostly at night and on weekends (US time)

• Add to bump limits

• Can be filtered by ID once they are observed (unless they are using the shared Tor ID 000000 and you don't wish to filter legit Tor anons)

• Are not perfect and can be easily spotted

• Were deployed starting on the /CBTS/ board

• Have certain flaws that can cause them to misfire, sometimes comically

• The handlers can make bogus clown threads, but also can be confused by accidental ones

• Handlers still cannot access the servers

• Have still not succeeded in their mission

• Still cannot meme

• Have been known to take authentic memes and deface them – because their meme-fu is weak and lacking originality or authenticity

>>8292258