we can conclude from the gang-staulking of the last bread that shills are very upset about discussions of
5G
Nanotech
the picture here is one of an old cup alledged to be from ancient times, but is it, instead, an item recently found to defuse patents for various kinds of nanotech?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lycurgus_Cup
Buttons and Breastplates
did you read how the glass works?
it includes nano silver and gold for startling effect!
what I found interesting was how much flack I got for merely off-the-cuff thoughts about the shoes and why they would break. I hit a nerve last bread. And many who were shills (and maybe one who was not) were triggered by it.
sorry the one who says he was not who is here:
>>8291933 (lb)
sorry if I was wrong in my ascertion. you are the only one who stated a rational request for reconsideration.
my mind works in blurts of insight and sometimes I post it quickly so the discussion doesn't end with the bread.
that's part of the joy of being able to quickly ascertain connections.
the gang staulking of the last bread tells volumes about the concerns of shills.
obviously polishing a throw away shit post here isn't what I do.
but those who critisize the way I spell 'gang-staulking' might consider that I do not mean gang-stalking, which would imply someone physically doing that to me, on the street.
so my penchant to constantly misspell this might be a good indication that perhaps it's a good thing to say that on-line gang-staulking is not the same as gang-stalking on the street.
and don't get me onto my thoughts about about gang-stockings, at Christmas over the hearth.
but my linquistic creativity is called 'stupid' by other anon. and I quickly blurt shill shill shill (how annoying of me.)
but the fact of them being so hard hearted is the tell for me.
and they ought to be able to see humor, or find levity, but instead it's the long-knifes of being hateful, hurtful, vindictive and down right mean. (or is this me being hyperbolic?)
is it stupid to not take a shit post as seriously as others do?
is it stupid to pass over simple transposition of key strokes, and not reveiw and just hit send? is it dumb to demand a less mean and derisive response to posts?
or to point out: these people coordinate what they do. The choose and active and vocal person and 'gang-staulk' them. Add it to the dictionary with that spelling and attribute it to some 'stupid anon' who knew that two words for two things. stalk: to do it in the real world, staulk for doing it virtually.
whatever, who cares, I see what they do. I describe what they do, they make excuses to filter me. I don't care.
that group had major dealings in Boston, and Whitey was in Boston too.