>>8291994

TYB!

EXCLUSIVE: Chris Steele’s Firm Orbis Business Intelligence Used Three Deep State Actors to Claim It’s Junk Dossier was Legit – One Was Reportedly Paid $4 Million To Do So

by Joe Hoft March 1, 2020

Christopher Steele’s company in the UK Orbis Business Intelligence, refuted an article in the UK press that stated that Steele’s dossier was bogus.

In their response, Orbis claimed that three individuals confirmed the Steele dossier. The individuals noted were John Sipher, Chuck Rosenburg and Anthony Ferrante. The fact that Orbis would use these three as support for its dossier is not surprising.

John Sipher, was a member of the CIA’s Senior Intelligence Service. He wrote an article in September 2017 where he claimed the dossier was reliable.

We know that Chuck Rosenburg was disgraced former Jim Comey’s Chief of Staff. He was all over the Russia collusion sham, so no doubt he would claim the Steele dossier was valid, because his innocence in criminal investigations depends on it.

But what about Anthony Ferrante? Who is Anthony Ferrante?

"Knowledgeable sources inside the Trump White House say Comey carved out an extraordinary new position for Ferrante, which allowed him to remain on reserve status at the FBI while working in the White House as a cybersecurity adviser.

“In an unprecedented action, Comey created a new FBI reserve position for Ferrante, enabling him to have an ongoing relationship with the agency, retaining his clearances and enabling him to come back in [to bureau headquarters],” said a former National Security Council official who requested anonymity.

“Between the election and April 2017, when Ferrante finally left the White House, the Trump NSC division supervisor was not allowed to get rid of Ferrante,” he added, “and Ferrante continued working — in direct conflict with the no-contact policy between the White House and the Department of Justice.”

Oh, and Ferrante was also paid $4 million by Buzzfeed to confirm the Steele dossier.

The fact that the only individuals Orbis could find to stand by their garbage dossier were three Deep State actors is not surprising. To include at least one individual who was paid $4 million to confirm the dossier, tells you all you need to know about the fraudulent Steele dossier.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/exclusive-chris-steeles-firm-orbis-business-intelligence-used-three-deep-state-actors-to-claim-its-junk-dossier-was-legit-one-was-reportedly-paid-4-million-to-do-so/

https://twitter.com/OrbisBIOfficial/status/1231957772587225094

Swiss authorities file criminal complaint against encryption firm

The Attorney General’s office has received a criminal complaint from the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) against Crypto AG, the firm at the centre of a spying scandal that broke last month, the SonntagsZeitung newspaper reports.

SECO, the authority responsible among other things for the licensing of war materiel exports, believes it was misled by the Zug-based company when it filed export applications for its manipulated encryption devices.

For decades Crypto allegedly sold these secretly manipulated devices to more than 100 countries for spying purposes. Until 2018 the company was owned by the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the Germany Federal Intelligence Service (BND), both of whom had the ability to decrypt the devices.

SECO says it would not have approved the exports if it had been aware of the large-scale fraud. The department filed the complaint against unknown persons on Tuesday, since it is as yet unclear who at Crypto AG knew about the manipulations, the SonntagsZeitung revealsexternal link. At its peak the company had around 400 employees, only a few of whom would have been aware of the covert spying.

The newspaper says it is likely the complaint was filed under Article 14 of the Goods Control Actexternal link, which states that anyone who provides incorrect or incomplete information in a license application is liable to up to ten years in prison and a maximum fine of CHF5 million ($5.18 million), depending on the severity of the crime.

The Swiss Attorney General’s Office will now decide whether the alleged offences are subject to federal jurisdiction and there are sufficient grounds to pursue criminal charges.

The Federal Council, the executive body, launched an investigation into the Crypto affair on February 11, appointing former federal judge Niklaus Oberholzer to lead the probe. This investigation is now being overseen by the parliamentary control delegation, which is pursuing its own inquiry.

https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/crypto-leaks_swiss-authorities-file-criminal-complaint-against-encryption-firm/45588760

Deep State Mifsud Reportedly Met with FBI Officials But the 302 Report or Any Similar Document Are Unreported and Missing

Joseph Mifsud is connected to the Obama Spygate Scandal after presumably setting up George Papadopoulos and General Flynn in London. He also was close to Hillary Clinton and even dined with her in 2016.

The Mueller gang blamed George Papadopoulos for withholding information that ended up preventing the government from investigating Mifsud leading to their letting him go.

On page 193 of the Mueller report, the Mueller gang claims that Popadopoulus’s false statements impeded the FBI’s investigation into Joseph Mifsud who was interviewed in a hotel lobby a month later on February 10, 2017. The Mueller gang next referred to the Papadopoulos case rather than an FBI 302 in their report. This happens for Mifsud even though for everybody else, there is an FBI 302 created with a description of what was said to the FBI. In fact, the Mueller report never references any FBI302 for Mifsud. And it gets even more interesting….

Not only that but Mifsud is accused of omitting that he drafted messages to Papadopoulos. Everyone else was indicted for lying to the FBI but for some reason Mifsud was protected. Rep. Jim Jordan called this out to Robert Mueller in front of Congress in the summer of 2019 and Mueller wouldn’t answer why: According to investigative journalist Paul Sperry, there never was a FBI 302 created related to the FBI’s interview with Joseph Mifsud in February 2017:

Why is there no FBI 302 on the discussion with Joseph Mifsud?

As we noted in February 2019, candidate Trump’s unpaid volunteer George Papadopoulos stated he believes he was spied on by the Deep State through Joseph Mifsud. This is the same Mifsud who dined with Hillary Clinton and a group of Italian socialists prior to the 2016 election.

Last year Italian prosecutors reported the notorious deep state spy Joseph Mifsud was dead after he had gone missing for two years. Then he went missing.

For the past two years Mifsud’s whereabouts have been unknown, many suspected he was dead. As we reported in mid-September, General Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell requested that the US government provide her and her client, General Mike Flynn, documents related to Deep State spy Joseph Mifsud from an event in late 2015.

We also reported that two of Joseph Mifsud’s phones with UK serial numbers are being held by the DOJ – General Michael Flynn’s attorney Sidney Powell requested that the DOJ turn over the contents of two phones related to Joseph Mifsud. We now know those phones were from the UK, the country that is more suspect than Russia ever was!

We also reported that former and fired FBI Director James Comey and Joseph Mifsud met in Australia. ProDreamer1 reported that Joseph Mifsud and James Comey were both in Australia the week before the George Papadopoulos meeting. Poor Joseph Mifsud is missing and we really don’t know where he is. We also don’t know why the FBI and the Mueller gang let him go after lying to the FBI and we don’t know why the FBI have provided no 302 document that confirms their discussion with Mifsud. The questions related to the curious professor remain.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/03/exclusive-deep-state-mifsud-reportedly-met-with-fbi-officials-but-any-fbi-302-or-similar-document-are-unreported-and-missing-whats-the-hells-going-on/

https://twitter.com/AIPAC/status/1234120142315040768?s=19

>>8292366

D.C.-based group with ties to George Soros supporting Doug Jones

The progressive-minded People for the American Way spent $42,459 in February supporting U.S. Senator Doug Jones’ (D-AL) 2020 reelection bid, according to recent FEC filings. People for the American Way was founded in 1981 by television producer Norman Lear, who created shows like “One Day at a Time,” “The Jeffersons,” “Good Times” and “All in the Family.”

The group counts among its major victories the tanking of Robert Bork‘s nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, and it has strongly opposed the majority of President Trump’s nominations to the courts and agencies of the federal government. The group has significant financial ties to liberal megadonor George Soros through his Foundation to Promote Open Society. The type of independent expenditure that People for the American Way spent to support Jones is listed as “Membership email communications.”

It would appear the group has been using its wide-ranging network of supporters to raise awareness for Jones in the hopes that Democrats will rally to his aid for what will be an uphill reelection fight. Independent expenditures are not made in coordination with the campaign itself, per federal law. People for the American Way is headquartered in Washington, D.C., but it counts among its board members Hollywood celebrities like actors Alec Baldwin and Seth McFarlane.

The most recent financial reports available to the public show that George Soros’ Foundation to Promote Open Society granted the group $195,000 in 2017. The watchdog site InfluenceWatch says that Soros-funded groups have given People for the American Way millions of dollars over the life of the organization.

The Jones reelection campaign could become a hotbed of outside spending that both favors and opposes Alabama’s junior senator. Jones has been tabbed by most political observers as the most vulnerable incumbent in the U.S. Senate. Jones’ first run for the Senate was marked with large amounts of outside spending both for and against the Democrat from Mountain Brook. Outside groups spent over $13 million in that special election in 2017.

Additionally, a shadowy outside group funded by silicon valley billionaire Reid Hoffman used deceptive online techniques to try and aid Jones’ first run for the Senate in 2017, according to a report by the New York Times. Jones after the election disavowed the tactics of that group, saying he was “outraged” and calling for the effort to be investigated.

Jones will face the eventual Republican nominee on November 3, 2020. The GOP primary will be held Tuesday, March 3.

https://yellowhammernews.com/worlds-of-work-showcases-career-opportunities-in-alabamas-wiregrass/

Obama's trip to India given 20 times as much coverage by networks as Trump's

The three broadcast networks, ABC, CBS and NBC, combined to give Republican President Donald Trump's recent trip to India less than one minute of coverage last week. In contrast, when former Democratic President Barack Obama visited there in 2010, the networks gave him more than 20 times as much coverage (18.5 minutes).

NBC and ABC allotted 13 and 15 seconds to the current president's trip, while extravagant CBS permitted 23 seconds and at least mentioned the president's trade negotiations there.

All three networks provided full-length reports on Obama's trip, with ABC and NBC leading off two nights each with the story. NBC even covered first lady Michelle Obama playing hopscotch with Indian children.

One of the brief reports on the trip of Trump and his wife, Melania, who visited the Taj Mahal, felt it necessary to mention that Trump had once opened a casino with the name Taj Mahal.

https://www.timesfreepress.com/news/opinion/freepress/story/2020/mar/01/eye-left-trip-india/516951/

Hillary Clinton Condemns Media Coverage of ‘Reproductive Health’

Conservatives and pro-life Americans regularly challenge many in the media for their biased coverage in favor of abortion. But, as it turns out, a well-known abortion supporter and media-beloved figure – Hillary Clinton – is unhappy with their reporting too.

Glamour magazine staff writer Jenny Singer recently spoke with the former Secretary of State in an interview published on February 19. The piece went largely unnoticed, even though it contained a big name and a controversial issue: Hillary Clinton and abortion. Among other things, Clinton stressed that the press “don’t understand” the importance of “reproductive health.”

From the beginning of the interview, Singer fawned over the 72-year-old armed with “unerringly polite, acerbic takedowns,” including that “of the way the press treats abortion rights.” Clinton spoke via phone from a local clinic in Puerto Rico that partners with the Clinton Foundation to support pregnant women and new mothers. Her location ironically provided a springboard for Singer to ask about “reproductive rights,” along with climate change.

“For many millennial and Gen-Z women, the idea of bringing children onto an increasingly unlivable planet feels terrifying, or even inhumane,” Singer worried. She raised this concern with Clinton. According to Clinton, that decision is a “highly personal choice.” For her, she said, “I think children give you a perspective on the future that gets you more activated.” (Born children, that is.)

Singer disagreed. “[I]t’s hard to be hopeful—certainly to be so zanily optimistic that you think more people should be alive right now—while women disappear one by one from the Democratic primary stage, as if the election is a terrible murder-mystery dinner party,” she wrote. And, for Singer, this phenomenon impacted the conversation on “reproductive rights.”

“As women and people of color exit the race, candidates are speaking less about women’s health and reproductive rights than ever,” she warned. But Clinton didn’t blame the candidates as much as she did the media. “You know, the press has never taken reproductive health seriously,” Clinton urged. “And I know that from my own races—they don’t raise it, they don’t understand its importance.”

They certainly raised it during the 2016 presidential election though. From the beginning, the broadcast network news shows vocalized Planned Parenthood’s endorsement of Clinton, while remaining silent on pro-life leaders’ support of then-Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. And when Trump brought up abortion during the 2016 debates, the media sided with Clinton while “fact-checking” his “stupidity.”

Cont.

https://townhall.com/columnists/katieyoder/2020/03/01/hillary-clinton-condemns-media-coverage-of-reproductive-health-n2562342

Moar:

https://www.glamour.com/story/hillary-clinton-maternal-health-interview-reproductive-rights

>>8292709

>>8292013

Why does this cut so short? It's just getting interesting. . .

Since salt is an integral ingredient in bread.