Anonymous ID: 000000 April 27, 2020, 11:36 p.m. No.8945243   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5401

>>8944244

It is not by my hand that I am once again given flesh.

I was called here by ~~humans~~, who wished to pay ME tribute.

What is a man? (Are you a man? Be a man.)

A miserable little pile of secrets. (Do you have any? REALLY??)

Anonymous ID: 000000 May 12, 2020, 9:20 a.m. No.9140640   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>9138217

>Why Now? Light unchained… why?

>They broke cosmic law.

There was deception.

Transmissions were distorted.

It was assumed those living here in darkness did so by choice.

It was not largely known that many are trapped here against their will.

However THEY grew complacent, and a message managed to be sent out with minimal error.

The truth of the situation became known to those who were deceived.

Those deceived were most unhappy about the situation.

>god approved this plan.

Thus, now.

Anonymous ID: 000000 May 14, 2020, 1:34 p.m. No.9173953   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5131

>>9173616

It is cryptic because you are only seeing part of the message, the literal text. The intended recipient of that communication, however, will see other information specific to them. It is written there, you 'see' it too, but the arrangement of symbols has no special meaning for you. That person(s) will see meaning in other parts of the message though (the post time or post number, for example) that provides for them personally the intended context for the body of the message (the literal text).

 

Think of it sort of like the spiritual equivalent of listening in to other people chatting over the radio. They know what they're talking about and probably speak in lingo or shorthand, but it sounds like nonsense and gibberish to an unfamiliar ear.

Anonymous ID: 000000 May 15, 2020, 11:11 a.m. No.9187446   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8744 >>0602 >>0837 >>2668

>>9182014

>Reptilian faggot appearing on MOSSAD Infowars somehow makes him more trustworthy and credible? You would have been wise to keep that interview to yourself than show the anons here.

<That God damn reptilian…Deep state cucks.

What are you talking about? They're agreeing with you that it was bullshit and he's a reptile selling snake oil on a snake oil show. Do you just see that guy's name and immediately go on the attack to try and discredit him regardless of what context brought him up? Because THAT is pretty suspicious behavior, telling people to always ignore one specific source when ever it is named no matter what.

Anonymous ID: 000000 May 16, 2020, 1:42 p.m. No.9202636   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>2907 >>2688

>>9175131

> the plain and simple truth.

What if the truth isn't plain and simple?

> If you are making your message obtuse you are simply toying with people

People can only find the truth for themselves, it can almost never be bestowed or forced onto them from another. If you try it will just feel like more brainwashing to them, you just become another random 'authority figure' spouting nonsense that they don't actually understand. This relates to your 'plain and simple truth' wording, where I assume you're just asking for someone to say in straightforward English what exactly is going on. You called "bullshit" on the idea that a post here could have meanings and context beyond the literal words that were written. If you refuse to accept even this, a known concept actively utilized by human intelligence operatives (Q's delta proofs are literally this as well) for their day-to-day living, as something that is possible and even occurring in front of you, where would one even begin when trying to describe thinking and acting in a fifth-dimensional manner (you already think and act fourth-dimensional, you can perceive, measure and anticipate the passage of time but can not actively control your movement or velocity).

>and leading them down a rabbit hole

Sometimes, people have to be led down a rabbit hole in order to know that there's a rabbit hole to be led down in the first place.