>>829483

Can you guys help an anon out? When this first came about, I cheered for the possibility of suing SA, for their role in 911. NOW, Potus needs SA to help get rid of the terrorist groups over there. Won't this damage our relations with them?

>>829691

Bigger picture kind of thing. Good point. Thanks anon.

>>829707

IMO, Gowdy is done with DC. He can't get out of there fast enough. Chavetz was also fed up with the deep state. He's said so many times. We'll see how long Nunez can tolerate it.

>>829955

I'm just curious as to how that equates to Mueller.

>>829983

The connection between the FBeye and Mueller is what I don't get. Doesn't Mueller have his own guys to detain people? Is Mueller able to order the FBeye into detaining and questioning citizens? How does a Special Prosecutor have control of FBeye? Yes, I read he has to go in front of a grand jury, but we really don't know which grand jury do we?

>>829971

anons have been repeatedly asked to not engage with FE'ers. Yet every bread they continue to do so. SMH

>>830019

I think you are confused anon. His title alone should tell you he prosecutes. He can hire anyone he needs to do the job of investigating. He has no control of Wray's Dept.

>>830047

If you want to go with the term Counsel instead of Prosecutor fine. But the point remains, he has prosecutors on his staff. Staff that he hired. He has unlimited funds to hire whoever he needs to. So, why is the FBeye involved at all with Mueller?

>>830054

>>830054

good catch anon. Brings a whole new meaning to Potus past tweet.

>>830086

That's not how it works. Mueller has already empaneled a grand jury, outside of the DOJ. DOJ has no control over Mueller investigation, except to ask for a termination of the investigation. In fact, not even Sessions can fire Mueller. FBI has absolutely 0 to do with Mueller.

We are getting no where with this. Thanks for attempting to help.