https:// www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/17/in-america-theresa-may-would-be-a-dangerous-pinko–which-is-why/
more pinkos
https:// www.nytimes.com/2016/07/28/fashion/hillary-clinton-theresa-may-michelle-obama-power-dressing.html
Ms. May, who took office earlier this month, is the starkest proponent of this. She has been entirely unabashed about her own interest in fashion, especially shoes, from leopard-print kitten heels to lipstick-print ballet flats and patent leather over-the-knee boots, worn to greet the president of Mexico during a trip to Buckingham Palace.
May is in the pocket of China. Ma just bought big in to fashion because of trump brought about changes in the trading of counterfeit goods.
https:// www.youtube.com/watch?v=VCtzOvp-ewM
https:// www.socialeurope.eu/theresa-may-created-opening-clinton-discuss-codetermination
May’s reforms are designed to replace the cozy, Randian British executive suite culture with one prioritizing corporate competitiveness and responsibility, a direct reaction to the angst and frustration evident in Brexit. “Big business needs to change,” she declared July 10, in order to nurture “a country that works for everyone, not just the privileged few.” Importantly, May’s corporate governance reforms go beyond say-on-pay to enterprise adoption of codetermination, supported with some intensity by the British Institute of Directors. The German evidence is powerful that worker representatives on corporate boards result in less job offshoring and more robust investment, wages and job creation at home. Shareholders benefit as well. Indeed, American economists have documented how financial markets grant such firms a higher Tobin’s Q.
WHAT???^^^^^^
https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tobin%27s_q
Tobins Q? anyone dig this before?