Question: Who's the Deep State's preferred candidate now?

So anons, I thought for sure Buttigieg was the Deep State choice. Shows how much I know.

I'm revising my guess to: the candidate they think that has the best chance of beating Trump. It's not that they don't want Sanders to win–it's that they don't think he has a chance to beat POTUS. The sense that I get is that they're all entwined, in some way, with the cabal. We know that many of them felt that, by running, they might protect themselves from prosecution by screaming "election interference!" We've already seen it with Biden.

I see them all as a sort of "shotgun" spray attempt by the cabal to just "throw everything and see what sticks." Want another smooth metrosexual with a hint of minority cred (Obama template)? Buttigieg. Want a hard-nosed, tell-it-like-it-is success story (Manchurian Trump)? Bloomberg. Want the established guy (past success template)? Biden. Want a woman vetted by the established authorities (HRC template)? Warren. Want a woman that has some homebody appeal? Klobuchar. Want free money? Yang. Want free everything and fuck successful people they make me feel bad? Sanders.

If I had to choose one favorite now, I'd say Warren. But they'd all be disastrous, if they had a chance.

>>8295593

You should take the opportunity to thank him on the "letters of appreciation" board–Q mentioned that they read all of them.

Also, in the past Q has interacted with the boards without actually posting with his trip code–especially right around the time he first established it. I'm sure he monitors the board from time to time, whether or not in his official capacity as Q or just to get a sense of where we're at.

I don't believe we're ever really alone here.

>>8295619

That's a good point. I think there's a lot of evidence of a fractured command structure–particularly in the media narrative and how haphazard it's been. It may be the case that these candidates are simply doing what they think is in their best interest to save their own asses, and the media is doing likewise.

But I think it's also pretty clear that they'd rather it not be Sanders. One could go deeper and say this is meant to expose them yet again–Sanders supporters are dumb but passionate, and if he were to get fucked again they would be out for blood–many of them would go to POTUS because they would realize everything the Democrats have stood for is an outright lie. I should give /ourguys enough credit to believe that, but I'm going with the more "reasonable" expectation: the deep state still has a voice in the media, and that voice wants someone besides Bernie. For now.

My actual assumption is that there isn't even going to be an election. Not on November 3rd, anyway.

>>8295675

So it looks like the rate has remained fairly steady this whole time–no sign of slowing down. That's both good and bad; good because it means that more bad guys are going to be arrested, but bad because it means each office has likely been working to their capacity; odds are good that they won't have everything done by the time the storm hits.

Of course they've got to be prioritizing the worst offenders first, so it's all good.

>>8295754

Probably one night of Brad Pitt's ass.

>>8295830

Right–but if one looks over a litany of evidence and offenders, one might see a pattern of connections that lead to the same place. If the offences are related to something like stealing pillow tags, those will likely be sidelined for something involving, say, trafficking in children. So I'm not disputing what you said–it's absolutely the case that it must be so–but there is some leeway in priority.

I also expect that many of these cases are going to be opened bottom-up; we've already seen several arrests of people. But I do believe that there will come a time when many of these sealed cases will be opened at once–that would be related to the "suicide weekend" and "ten days of darkness" Q mentioned early on.

That's how I view "The Storm." I had thought they'd abandoned that plan, but I've changed it back–it's coming right now as we speak, behind the white squall.