a link would have been nice…
js
A 'vulture' circles over Twitter
A hedgie, Singer probably would first and foremost be making his decision to hostilely take over Twitter, based on the fact that it must have unrealized profits, something he could force Twitter into making if he gets his men or women on that board with enough power to clean house.
The news accounts cite Twitter's refusal to take political ads in the election cycle, on the pious grounds that they could affect the election, is likely one source of unrealized profits.
But there are plenty more: Twitter's history of capricious censorship against conservatives has got to be driving traffic away from the site, too. For every conservative they ban, they lose money in lost traffic and clicks. Since they do it a lot, and to big players such as actor James Woods, whose pithy comments have delighted millions, they lose millions.
Here's another thing: The company may well have a depressed valuation based on its risk of ligigation and even more important legislation. The site claims to be a public platform and therefore exempt from libel laws, but its policy of censorship of conservatives makes it a highly edited platform. They're likely to be eventually sued for the double standard and it's all their own doing.
Watch Singer get in there and force this social media giant to live up to its promises. That would be good news for conservatives in the short term.
In the long term, it might be even better. Singer's breach of Fortess Social Media with all its monolithic leftist denizens might just be a first step for a conservative long march through the institutions, the cultural takeover that the late Andrew Breitbart dreamed of happening.One hopes more conservative billionaires start getting in on the act and buying up newspapers, educational establishments, television and radio stations and social media companies in following. A giant could tumble.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/03/a_vulture_circles_over_twitter.html
ya think?
the article is a good read
Singer sounds like /our guy/
hates socialists and loves to make money
if he can pull this off he'll make money and be a hero
just watched the interview
Charlie sounds like a /pol/tard
knows his shit, reminds me of Sargon
knows and understands the roots of the marxist mental disease (socialism) and understands what is necesary to combat it
here's the interview
>Shitbags like Paul Singer are why coins have milled edges.
and if you'd read the article you'd know that Singer has his eye set on taking @Jack's company away from @Jack's control
one shitbag destroying another…
is that really a bad thing?
butyric acid