>>8295942 lb

makes one wonder how many real people are actually engaged here.

the unique UID stats and all that have always been tiny - a fraction of a percent of our countries total population.

>asspull incoming because I don't know if there's a way to check total traffic

I dunno, maybe multiply that by 10 or 20 to account for lurkers?

There's a multiplier effect when things get repeated in other platforms I'm sure.

Anyone know how much actual traffic /qresearch does get?

I'm looking for more than a Q post - something that can be independently verifiable.

>>8296012

>>8296042

c'mon man…

>>8296100

>over a million

nice - that's just for this board?

Social media is fucked so long as those who control the various platforms primary response to anything is to censor, silence or de-platform, rather than simply provide tools for the end user to control their own experience - what they see/read for themselves.

The fact that this isn't the norm tells you everything you need to know about social media and who controls it.

they've corrupted a tool of knowledge/liberation into a leash/whip.

>>8296148

they haven't "given up" on anything, these DS/NWO fuckers are worse than cockroaches or pubic lice.

he's dropping to run as shitbag Biden's veep.

Sleepy Joe & Poopchute Pete

>>8296125

If Woods is praising Paul Singer, fuck James Woods with a cactus.

Shitbags like Paul Singer are why coins have milled edges. destructive parasites.

they're not capitalists, they are wreckers. Looters. In every sense of the word.

>>8296263

the influence on public dialogue is observable so there's an effect, lugenpresse wouldn't be freaking out and running hitpeices if there wasn't some sort of effect.

some way to see the stats - even weekly or monthly would be nice.

there used to be 3rd party traffic sites that did that, no idea if that's a thing anymore or if 8kun is even tracked by any that still exist given the "unpersoning" the site went through last year.

>>8296290

trading one shitbag for another is a non-starter.

>>8296317

I did - the vulture thing is a ref to Singer.

Woods isn't talking about buying twitter.

>>8296399

it still all boils down to what the guiding ethos of the company is - censorship vs free speech.

>>8296400

>Shareholders should stage a palace coup.

If only…and not just twatter.

No sign of that happening with any media conglomerate. the majority holders are all on the same page.

Look at media - news channels hemoraging viewer/money, entertainment properties leveraged to to push agendas & propaganda despite losing money/viewers.

Then there's the absolute state of the internet, as seen by what's happened with this very site and the shit Watkins is having to deal with.

Some old fashioned bullmoose trust busting is WAY overdue, and I think the only way out of this shit.

>>8296543

a couple helpful anons already responded, pointing some stuff out