Maybe if you took some time to think before responding to anon you could actually reason it out.
Trump day 2 was 1/22/17. Q arrived 10/28/17. Even if we're considering that "no deals" meant LITERALLY no deals whatsoever, then that's 9 months that the DS had to change their minds.
But you don't want to think. You just want to be right.
No one cares what I think.
My point is that YOU are not thinking.
Otherwise you'd be able to reason that, if Trump said "I'm willing to let things slide" on Day 2, then maybe, I dunno, the passing of 279 days would be a long enough window of time for him to change his mind? Conceivable? I've changed my mind about things, I didn't need 279 days to change my mind.
I'm being generous and not counting for the fact that Q didn't even say "no deals" for another 2 months (#447 on Dec 23 2017.)
Your "argument" is based on making snappy responses to things that SOUND like victories ("haha I thought there were no deals? lmao look at this ur so wrong") but are not, because once you start thinking them through, there's nothing but air.
You built up a strawman of "Q lied about no deals because Trump said he was willing to let HRC go" and then attacked it.
I deconstructed your strawman and you pretend it still exists while calling my deconstruction of your strawman essentially Stockholm syndrome.
What happens when someone believes their own strawman? Self-deception?
You decide what you want to believe is true.
I choose to think things through, because to ignore the notion that minds can change over the course of 300 days is frankly just silly.
When you're unwilling to challenge your own narrative, you're ironically more "cult-like" than what you imagine "Q cultists" to be.