dChan
Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:10 a.m. No.8306934   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Hi anons. Here are some fun handy tips on sterilization. You wouldn't wanna be in a biomedical hazard situation and not have some basic info right?

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:16 a.m. No.8306941   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6968 >>7077 >>7201 >>7260 >>7514 >>7595 >>7624

>>8306936

 

I'm pastaing an anon who dropped his digs on all the reinfection stories. The most important aspect of the story in terms of virulence of the coronavirus.

 

Anonymous (ID: T540GlVJ) 03/01/20(Sun)07:22:10 No.246005263▶>>246005396 >>246005723

 

>>246005032

>there's no proof of it.

 

28-Feb: Israeli "recovered" case tests positive again

https://archive.is/TV8DS

 

28-Feb: South Korea "recovered" case reinfected

https://archive.is/Gv1iu

 

27-Feb: Xuzhou first case reinfected weeks after "recovery"

https://archive.is/CuOtr

 

27-Feb: Recovered in Japan sick again: reinfected or dormant

https://archive.is/HjykE

 

26-Feb: 14% of recovered in Guangdong test positive again

https://archive.is/V6IgT

 

21-Feb: Patient reinfects himself after recovery

https://archive.is/8Ppkx

 

19-Feb: "There is a likelihood of relapse", expert says

https://archive.is/ABjjf

 

14-Feb: Reinfection possible and even deadlier

https://archive.is/Iw58p

 

31-Jan: Patients can get reinfected, no immunity after recovery

https://archive.is/W9vNf

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:24 a.m. No.8306961   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6970 >>7000

>>8306943

It's a bioweapon, in probability. If you want the digs on genomic studies you have to go deep in 4pleb /cvg/ and the papers are there. There have been multiple psy-op attempts to attribute the virus to different causes. Common sense suggests that even if China had a hand in the creation of the virus, it doesn't make sense.

 

  1. Accident

  2. Non nation state actor

  3. Nation state actor

 

Probably 1. Hope to God not 2. Really hope to God not 3.

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:36 a.m. No.8306978   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8306968

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_uY76efh18

 

Around 20:59 ish … this dude talks about cytokine storm prevention. there are some digs to follow from the links, it's a lotta work. Paul is kinda a fag to me, i like campbell.

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:41 a.m. No.8306990   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Public service announcement:

Bats are just sweet doggos with wings. Love your bat, and your bat will love you. The second best friend of Man.

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 2:55 a.m. No.8307030   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7040

>>8307020

You glowed in a previous post. You are nature glowing. Gotcha, but at least your making an effory.

 

That glow don't fly soldier. It's origin is already known by the parties who get to be read in to that shit. Prob not many. At this point we can only theory craft the intent of the bioweapon. It's lethality is up to question, but it's way too soon.

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 3:06 a.m. No.8307064   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8307058

https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Caixin/Will-warm-weather-kill-new-coronavirus-Scientists-not-sure

>Will the coronachan outbreak burn out in the summer?

>the point when the number of infected people declines is still not in sight

>remains stable at 4 degrees Celsius and can survive for several years at 60 degrees below zero, according to the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. In higher temperatures, its resistance declines, but the temperature affects only the virus' survival time, not its ability to infect, the center says.

>SARS remains stable at 4 degrees Celsius, but will lose its activeness in three days at 37 degrees C (98.6F. Coronachan can currently live on surfaces for 9 days in optimal temperatures)

>But differences between SARS and Coronachan make it difficult to predict the resilience of the new virus

>Coronachan is far more contagious than SARS

>As temperatures rise, coronavirus floats in the air or attaches to surfaces

>once in the body, its ability to infect does not decrease

http://archive.is/tXb8a

Anonymous ID: 0762f7 March 3, 2020, 3:11 a.m. No.8307078   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8307071

The truth is, that if it is dormant, we don't yet know (publically) how to test for dormant cases. If it is not dormant, it is then certainly reinfectious in some, a lot, or cases. Whichever is the answer one of the two will show up.