>>8306941

An early research article which was quickly retracted stated that the novel Wuhan virus was weaponized. The article detailed the genetic modifications and how they made a standard coronavirus more deadly. The longer latency period, the ability to spread during the time an infected person has no symptoms, the relatively few viral particles required to infect someone, and the HIV DNA insertions, which set up a cytokine storm when the virus re-emerges after presumptive recovery from the initial infection. These were listed in the article as ways in which the genetic modifications they found in the Wuhan virus would weaponize the common coronavirus.

Based on that study, the reinfections we're reading about now were to be expected. Also, we can expect that the reinfections will cause cytokine storms and be more deadly than the initial infection.

Caveat: The Powers That Be immediately censored the study and demanded that the journal retract the article, which happened. I don't know if the article can still be found online.

This is a screencap of the study after it had been pulled:

>>8306982

That's what Jon Rappoport's saying. I respect his qualifications to speak to this op. I also curate my information from a number of independent and disparate sources and then do my own thinking.

>>8306982

My biggest concern is imposition of quarantines, which was set up in statutes by the CDC under BHO. The propaganda press has set up the call to act, and POTUS has already announced DoD readiness. If whole cities or states are quarantined, as was planned all the way back in the first BHO administration, then the SHTF and I'm outta here.

>>8306992

Thus far, I've not read of any 5G systems using the 6GHz frequencies. It's the higher frequencies, combined with the modulation style used for 5G, which is associated with the skin rashes, sweating, breathing difficulties and oxygen absorption problems. So, while these two lists do line up convincingly, the published lists of frequencies in use in the various countries have not thus far included 6GHz.

I've been watching the 5G roll-outs with trepidation, and trying to keep up with all the announcements (there are many, daily). If you have sauce for actual 6GHz equipment availability, who is the manufacturer? Which carriers are installing 6Ghz? Whose test equipment is being used? Thus far, so far as I know, none of this is commercially available.

>>8307015

I just checked another source. Highest published frequencies in use for 5G are 28GHz. 60GHz is still in the planning and development stages.

Apologies for referencing Wikipedia, but it's the best non-technical source I have at this moment:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_5G_NR_networks>