Anonymous ID: d19853 March 3, 2020, 7:07 a.m. No.8307841   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7849

The modern Russian-Ukrainian theory of deep, abiotic petroleum origins is not controversial nor presently a matter of academic debate. The period of debate about this extensive body of knowledge has been over for approximately two decades (Simakov 1986). The modern theory is presently applied extensively throughout the former U.S.S.R. as the guiding perspective for petroleum exploration and development projects. There are presently more than 80 oil and gas fields in the Caspian district alone which were explored and developed by applying the perspective of the modern theory and which produce from the crystalline basement rock. (Krayushkin, Chebanenko et al. 1994) Similarly, such exploration in the western Siberia cratonic-rift sedimentary basin has developed 90 petroleum fields of which 80 produce either partly or entirely from the crystalline basement. The exploration and discoveries of the 11 major and 1 giant fields on the northern flank of the Dneiper-Donets basin have already been noted. There are presently deep drilling exploration projects under way in Azerbaijan, Tatarstan, and Asian Siberia directed to testing potential oil and gas reservoirs in the crystalline basement.

 

http://www.gasresources.net/index.htm

Anonymous ID: d19853 March 3, 2020, 7:18 a.m. No.8307896   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>7938

>>8307861

 

This is another sign that

Patriots Are Now In Control

In Hollywood.

The evil moguls are still there but they have less control over the movies now because of the number of patriots who have infiltrated the whole industry.

The is part of the BOTTOM TO TOP strategy

On the one hand, the low-level criminals like MS13 get arrested early on

But on the other hand, patriots infiltrate the big monopolies and start a slow process of change

Drip, drip dripping

Like water, oozing into the cracks and acting as a lubricant

To move things around.

 

The reason for this drip, drip, drip approach

Is to preserve the economy

And to increase the prosperity of everyone.

Anonymous ID: d19853 March 3, 2020, 7:59 a.m. No.8308093   🗄️.is đź”—kun

The Saudis are attempting to maximize recovery, not value in their fields. They are willing to produce more slowly and with the best possible technology in virtually every instance, even if that means not producing it economically optimal rates. That is to say, the net present value of production in the field is reduced by some other practices, even though the ultimate recovery of physical oil is maximized. The Saudis pointed out that the Yibal field in Oman suffered from the use of the MRC Wells, specifically because the producing company had not done the type of expensive geological modeling which is now common practice in Saudi Arabia.

 

Perhaps more important, the Saudis refuted several of his interpretations (similar to arguments I have made in the past). The Saudis do not produce many of their fields because they have abundant producing capacity without them for example. Also, Saudi Arabia is not intensively explored and has large areas with petroleum potential that are virtually undrilled. (Matt responded that he was referring to aerial magnetic surveys.) it was also pointed out that MattĂ­s reference to 1975 field reserve estimates were not relevant: the fields he referred to had already produced more than was estimated as proved reserves in the 1970s, reflecting reserve growth from better reservoir modeling, more drilling, and the use of advanced technology. (Indeed, in responding to a remark about the so-called Ă«spurious reserve additionsĂ­ in the 1980s, when many OPEC members raised their reported reserve levels without explanation, they responded that they had gone years without revising them even as their own expectations of recovery increased, and had merely decided the time was right to report them more accurately.)

 

…

 

There literally seems to be no evidence that the Saudi oil fields are facing any unusual challenges or that Saudi production will be constrained in the future by anything other than policy. All of the concerns appear to be instances where the most pessimistic interpretation has been chosen, such as fields not operating because of technical difficulties rather than weak demand. The use of vague language (tired fields, challenges) rather than specifics about efforts and costs indicate that this is one more instance of Malthusian bias.

Anonymous ID: d19853 March 3, 2020, 8:08 a.m. No.8308128   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>8133 >>8166

Fossil Fuel Theory for the Origin of Oil and Gas Debunked

 

https://oilandgasleaks.wordpress.com/2010/12/28/fossil-fuel-theory-for-oil-gas-debunked/

 

Russian geologist Nikolai Alexandrovitch Kudryavtsev was the first to propose the modern abiotic theory of petroleum in 1951. He analyzed the geology of the Athabasca Tar Sands in Alberta, Canada and concluded that no “source rocks” could form the enormous volume of hydrocarbons (estimated today 1.7 trillions barrels), and that therefore the most plausible explanation is abiotic deep petroleum. However, humic coals have been proposed for the source rocks by Stanton (2005).

Although this theory is supported by geologists in Russia and Ukraine, it has recently begun to receive attention in the West, where the biogenic petroleum theory is accepted by the vast majority of petroleum geologists. Kudryavtsev’s work was continued by many Russian researchers — Petr N. Kropotkin, Vladimir B. Porfir’ev, Emmanuil B. Chekaliuk, Vladilen A. Krayushkin, Georgi E. Boyko, Georgi I. Voitov, Grygori N. Dolenko, Iona V. Greenberg, Nikolai S. Beskrovny, Victor F. Linetsky and many others.

Astrophysicist Thomas Gold 1 was one of the abiogenic theory’s most prominent proponents in recent years in the West, until his death in 2004. Dr. Jack Kenney of Gas Resources Corporation[6][7][8] is perhaps the foremost proponent in the West. The theory receives continued attention in the media as well as in scientific publications.

Anonymous ID: d19853 March 3, 2020, 8:23 a.m. No.8308230   🗄️.is đź”—kun

>>8308166

 

It is closer than you think. Once one or two people go to court with a civil lawsuit, and win, you will see the dam burst. People will stand up for academic freedom and truth. The socialists will try to fire them or cut their grants, but patriots will go to court immediately to get injunctions. The lawsuits will go right to the top of the universities because it is the NEGLIGENCE of the governing bodies that allows these socialists to hold the power positions and play politics with that power, instead of supporting the pursuit of knowledge.

 

In fact, an organized campaign of public outcry directed at the universities could get many of them to clean house before it gets to the level of lawsuits.

 

We the people have all the power, if we would only stand up and exercise it! Voting is good but it is not enough.