Lurkers and Lawfags

Hoping for some insight, and to shine a light on this. I am prolly mistaken on a few details, but the greater implications escape anon.

This is notable in itself

Judge: Indiana owes ACLU more than $180,000 for challenge of abortion law

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/judge-indiana-owes-aclu-more-than-24180000-for-challenge-of-abortion-law/ar-BB10G8mE

So… Curtis Hill is ran thru federal court (civil?) for allegedly groping bunch of women at a bar, was found not guilty, then was pursued otherwise to suspend his law license and remove him from office, and from reelection eligibility.

House approves plan to remove attorney general if his law license is suspended

https://www.nwitimes.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/house-approves-plan-to-remove-attorney-general-if-his-law/article_073470d5-e169-5cac-88f6-29b6db588e42.html

I am digging for what he did to get the same treatment worthy of our President.

Seems odd that this would happen to a Dem.

White hat, Black hat, or Gray?

Thanks, Anons, For All You Do.