tyb's
CABAL71 USAF KC-135R Stratotanker I north from Honolulu hitting Alaskan coast
It won't be an issue when it comes to it. Section 10.2 of The Federal Reserve Act will be used.
there is a section in the Federal Reserve Act, Section 10.2, that says the president can remove the Fed Chair for cause, not policy views. It's obscure and does not expressly say what reasons it can be used for.
"…thereafter each member shall hold office for a term of fourteen years from the expiration of the term of his predecessor, unless sooner removed for cause by the President.”
https://www.federalreserve.gov/aboutthefed/section10.htm
This law was put into place in the 1940s after President Roosevelt had fired a board member of the Federal Trade Commission for not sharing the same public policy views. This firing was overturned by the Supreme Court on the basis that it was not a firing for cause. It was a unanimous decision. The FTC was put in to place in 1914.
"The Federal Trade Commission was created on September 26, 1914, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Trade Commission Act into law. The FTC opened its doors on March 16, 1915".
https://www.ftc.gov/es/about-ftc/our-history
You need to read it in full. Policy differences do not count. The other side will frame ALL of that as a policy decision because they will hide behind the FOMC -which is comprised of several voting members. Until the absolute criminality, collusion is exposed. I don't need to see something again..you've already posted that once.
I know exactly how it's transmitted and so do they. That is why they will hide behind the FOMC because it is perceived,by them, as apolitical. They have an out with this…that is it
"we voted on it and it's an overall VOTED policy decision"
Just watch….
Now some of the criminality from within the FRB will need to be exposed in some way so that section 10.2 can be used in it's fullest meaning. For cause.
tyb