>>83291

I'm glad at least someone is still using the work I did to learn some of the methodology.

Since you're looking at it, here's another one related to that Q drop [1-4] that I found that people mostly overlooked.

And another showing some incomplete thoughts on the missing [3] (haven't worked much on this, it's my thoughts from the day it dropped basically).

Now that our Twitter op is over (I switched to making these timelines and other memes, and no one would have payed attention if I posted markers), I'll probably go back and try to catch up on solving some and see what it leads to.

>>83671

Show your methodology for determining this is what was being referenced, or GTFO.

>>83674

>Q mentioned EO 6713A which ended the prohibition on alcohol in 1933.

That was done by the 21st amendment, not this EO. This EO was related to the code of labor for the alcohol industry.

Could still be a vague hint toward legalization (since it's related to alcohol and around the same time), but be careful drawing correlations based on incorrect source info.

>>83725

So then no methodology, just grabbing EOs and assuming that's what Q meant. Could still be correct, but these are essentially stabs in the dark.

>>83810

>>83462

Second image in this post is my best guess so far. Still looking to see if I can find a better match.

>>83856

Good find, but I posted that one a long time ago, it was mostly ignored (although it is in the batter above).

>>53080

Interesting thought on the z9, I'll have to see if there's another way to interpret that while including the -A as well. Never really thought to try to convert that to "Un"

Also, [89] could be [HI] (Hawaii).