A search engine for news, created by Gab:
https://trends.gab.com/search
"Today we are excited to announce the Gab Search Engine beta test. Gab Search is built into Gab Trends, and results include left, right, center, mainstream, independant, and alternative news sources, to help you see what the entire media landscape has to say about different topics."
(posting via Tor after getting the "Server Took Too Long" error on clearnet four attempts in a row)
Can we trust Q+? Can we trust the other side? Feels like we're being gaslighted by wealthy people.
Few anons will have much in the way of first hand sources. So I feel like in this age, we're putting faith not so much in Q or Q+ (or the opposition if that's you're thing) but rather into a system that is entirely unverifiable. The internet is potentially (and in practice, largely) a false reality. I don't trust much of what I'm seeing or reading.
If we see indictments unsealed not just against a few minor players like Biden in Ukraine for instance, but Hillary (as originally promised by Q), then it might be easier to "Trust the plan".
Incorrect shill analysis, anon. Q said the first indictment being unsealed will be a big deal. That would renew faith in the less faithful followers of the Q movement, and bring aboard new followers.
Knowing Trump, we can expect the first such indictment to be unsealed just before the election.
Back here in critical thinking land, we check sauces. Not just web links. Opposition of Q+ has lots of sauce. Unclear. Neutral. Waiting. Like many anons.
Trust but verify isn't shill. Blind faith is cult mentality.
Counterpoint: People are definitely falsely accused and convicted of crimes they didn't commit for political reasons. It's possible that Trump is patriotic and surrounded by people who've been put through the ringer. Open mind.
Money odds on Q identity:
DJT, Jr. - 6.5:1
Durham - 7.5:1
Note: Odds reflective of existence of multiple civilian members of Q team.