Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 9:45 p.m. No.8314037   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4043 >>4050 >>4131 >>4154 >>4388

Anyone else find it unusual that in Q drop #1515, in a list of 90+ media reporters who colluded with the DNC during the 2016 election, Chris Matthews was not included with the MSNBC group? The only one? Nowhere near our guy, but not exactly their guy either? Anomaly? Too troglodyte?

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 10:06 p.m. No.8314136   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314091

They're all DNC puppets. My impression is that he is not smart enough to be a handler. He is an old school D. His line in the sand was not voting for a communist. That set him apart, and why he was booted. So again, not our guy, but not their guy either. I believe there's more to this story.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 10:10 p.m. No.8314152   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314091

The other possibility is that he really doesn't like Jews. Old school Catholicโ€ฆ I know guys like him. That's a big reason why he stayed on TV for as long as he did. A large swath of America knows guys exactly like him.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 10:17 p.m. No.8314180   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4200 >>4206 >>4215 >>4218 >>4247 >>4268 >>4284

>>8314092

I'll be honest. I don't miss the latest Q drops. We are in a holding pattern. Either a deliberate pause to suggest a show of weakness, or it's a calm before a big storm. What additional set up do we need for something big to happen? Stage was set a long time ago, descending from high altitude, castle cleared, no more blockade moves after failed impeachment and all that.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 10:36 p.m. No.8314251   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314154

Yes, that is the kneejerk reply I would expect from QR. You have learned well, except for the part about thinking for yourself. If Matthews was a project Mockingbird op, then why did he go off script re BS and Nazi Germany? If that was part of the script, then he would NOT have been booted.

 

He was the only MSNBC reporter NOT included on the DNC collusion list (from the DNC Wikileaks file) in Q drop 1515.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 10:58 p.m. No.8314334   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>4419

>>8314255

He was a drunk and womanizer. Not enough skeletons? I suggest you drop any and all kindly thoughts and impressions about Hwood people. They reach the top for reasons that are not good. Read Hollywood Babylon if you need a refresher.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 3, 2020, 11:39 p.m. No.8314468   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314388

I don't believe it is that simple. Those not on the list are definitely outliers. Either fully briefed on Mockingbird directives by another source not identified on that DNC collusion list, or denied access for one reason or another. Those denied could easily play a part by disagreeing from time to time with the others, to give MSNBC an appearance of independence, as long as they didn't step over a line. Matthews was definitely in lock step with opposing all things R and Trump, and that was his job, even if he might have disagreed with the entire DNC agenda. He likely knew what and where those Do Not Cross lines were, but he obviously stepped over one that wasn't acceptable.

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 4, 2020, 12:02 a.m. No.8314542   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314466

If you do create a master list, it would be nice to see career details - years at what network, reason for dismissal, like in the cases of Keith Olberman and Bill O'Reilly. For that matter, include where they were schooled, boxes indicating lib or conservative, income, worthโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: 507021 March 4, 2020, 12:12 a.m. No.8314569   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8314451

Note the poster's high post count. All posts have a pro reporter appearance - red letter heading, concise articles, links and relevant images.The poster also links back to all of "his" posts as if a notable list. Not all of the stories are in disagreement with QR, but come off as more of a slide. A news aggregate. Quite a bit of effort.