THIS
When an anon makes a wild stab at it do we ridicule and mock? Well yes and no - YES if there is no sauce - but NO if there is a real effort to back up the idea. And if there IS sauce it is dissected and analyzied by the anons - and a consensus may (or may not) be achieved.
Case in point - anti-jewish posts that we have all seen by the hundreds. Clearly some anon or disruptors are dedicated to this idea. But after several dozen breads - where the evidence (sauce) for these claims was posted - anons seem to have reached a consensus - that it is just mostly non-productive shilling and hate speech. Life goes on. That is the process and it is a marvelous one. I will call it ANON DUE PROCESS. No court, no judge, no jury. no appeal - just a trial by your peers WE THE PEOPLE. This is a big part of GLORIOUS 2018.
you need one or the other you constipated moron
yes the notables seem a bit inconsistent and unreliable - could really be improved
but i like the organic no rules process of anon due process - hive mind at its best
no anon - the church is the largest institution that has maintained lies for 2000 years
it needs to be exposed for the great awakening
it is a big part of it
the PP is evil pro life fanatics also need to be called out
potus supports PP
Q leader did not and made anti PP posts w/o sauce
Q was fired
im with you anon - you did your part and
if your conscience is clear that is all that matters
mine is