I love clear and concise formats like this. The two paragraphs on Mack. Boom.
Some of us had no choice when it came to awakening. Me, spring of 1993, working a book all about the people behind the JFK assassination investigation (not written by me. I was just the editor), while the WACO event unfolded on CNN behind me, with Rush Limbaugh talking on the radio in the author's kitchen. Boom, boom, boom. The author was a hottie back in the day, too, so add another boom.
Close friends of mine, both staunch conservatives, Trump supporters, and circling the perimeter of the Great Awakening (they just want the arrests and hangings, not spending time digging and fretting), have a teenager about to graduate, and has been accepted into Loyola Marymount in Los Angeles. It's only one of a number of schools interested in the teen, but one of the highest rated in the country. I don't doubt that, but if LM is the final destination, we're probably going to have to give instructions to be extra aware of propaganda because CA school and all. Should we be extra extra concerned? Something we don't know other than the Jesuit roots?
National Review still does have to sell a magazine, or at the least their brand. In conventional magazines such as NR, a compromised tone is the norm. A softer, gentler damning. More of a pink pill as opposed to a crimson red pill.