>At the same time am reminded of Q's words that hit me upside the head like a 2x4: "We have it all."
>Bill Binney confirmed that when he told us that the NSA was literally vacuuming up EVERYTHING.
>So it's not a matter of law enforcement and prosecutors finding out whether evidence exists, it's knowing how to subpoena a needle in a haystack.
Fruit of the poison tree. Let's say NSA has incriminating evidence corroborating a crime. How was that information obtained?
Legally?
What would happen in court if evidence was obtained illegally?
What would happen to the defendants, the ones charged with the crimes?
Q drops r hints. Crimes were committed. Not actionable because of evidence source.
Digging allows sufficient connections to be made as basis for LEGAL investigation.
Even if still not enough for criminal investigation, enough for memes to triger red-pilling.
The court of public opinion is usually more effective than the criminal justice system.
The light of day is the best disinfectant.
Eye on the prize.
8chan = not-fake-news.
Rant Complete.