>1. The source is bs. What are the author's sources for that claim? "fire and fury" is also a book claiming bs about trump. Does
it make it true? No.
OK. Now you can present your source which shows that Netanyahu isn't friends with him? That this phone call never happened? Or are you just going to assert it without evidence, and your lack of evidence is more convincing than my evidence.
https://www.haaretz.com/1.5462012
>Shortly after the events of September 11, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon called Larry Silverstein, a Jewish real estate magnate in New York, the owner of the World Trade Center's 110-story Twin Towers and a close friend, to ask how he was. Since then they have spoken a few more times. Two former prime ministers - Benjamin Netanyahu, who this week called Silverstein a "friend," and Ehud Barak, whom Silverstein in the past offered a job as his representative in Israel - also called soon after the disaster. Yaakov Terner, the mayor of Be'er Sheva, sent a letter of condolence.
Is this also a fake source?
I've done research into this. If my research is wrong, it's wrong. But at least have the decency to act like an anon and counter sources with sources. Evidence with evidence. Stating I'm wrong and dumb isn't an argument that's worth responding to.
>2. So because netanyahu didnt run a redpilling project, but instead chose to re enter israeli politics later, makes him complicit? Well using that logic, it means that anyone who didnt start a redpilling project is complicit, which is just absurd.
No. That's not my argument at all. My argument is that Bibi knew about the plot, and it happened. That he did not stop it, and got on TV immediately to push the narrative that the US needs to go to war in the Middle East to avenge 9/11. He used it as pretext to push war with Iran, a war he has pushed as recently as the whole fiasco with planes and nukes in Iran. https://www.haaretz.com/1.4970678
Your argument was "Well Bill predicted it and then they killed him, therefore Bibi is a good guy". Which is a complete non-sequitor. I tried to make that clear by pointing out that Bibi wasn't punished for his claims, far from it. He became PM of Israel. You then use that as proof that he wasn't in on it.
That's like saying Bill Cooper was allowed to continue working while advocating for wars with Israel's enemies (e.g., Iran) so therefore he's obviously a good guy. It's an incoherent argument. Could it be true? Yes. Is it good evidence it's true? No.
Why is this hard?
>3. There is praise, and there is complete endorsement and sharing you advisors and staff with him. Do you actually think it is the same thing?
Romney got the complete endorsement of Trump. Did he not? I do think it's the same thing. you're going to have to do more than try to shame me for my opinion that is based in the similarity of these events. I've been the subject of more struggle sessions by Marxists than you can imagine, so I'm used to this. Just give me the argument and stop trying to claim I'm just dumb.
>Scaramucci was used for optics, who knows if he has even turned on trump or still plays with the fake msm with trumps blessing. In any case, how can that even be comparable to what trump does for bibi.
It's pretty clear from Q that Scaramucci isn't a great guy. You're the first person to suggest that Mucci's attacks on Trump are with the blessing of Trump. Do you have anything to back this up?
And how it's comparable is they're both people in Trump's orbit who turned out to be not great people. Now I think based on the Mucc's sucking at the teat of the MSM/cabal money pits that he's a bad guy, but feel free to justify him still being onside.
>Romney? Trump bashed him constantly, with minor tongue in cheek praises. How can you even compare these to what he does for netanyahu.
Did you watch the last time bibi was at the white house? Trump humiliated him. Body Language Ghost did a good video showing the body language between the two. It's very similar to what he did to Romney.
>Last but not least, Hussein spent millions of tax USD to oust netanyahu. Why?
Bibi's faction (whatever that is) wants the United States to attack Iran and start another war.
Hussein's faction (whatever that is) wants the United States to appease Israel, give them money and aid, and start a nuclear war.
As I said from the very beginning. I don't have the faintest fucking clue what is going on. From your comments, it doesn't seem like you do either. I'm asking for clarity, and for that you're attacking me. You just forgot because you're so angry. Whether that's because you're a shill or just seeing red I don't know. But seriously. Read what I'm writing.