Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 8:32 a.m. No.8333098   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3164

so what are those osprey guys going to do? Why so quiet recently? Am I getting my hopes up interpreting pic related as 5 days from now? disinfo?

Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 8:35 a.m. No.8333123   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8333099

that's kinda lazy. Maybe work to get a better picture of God and Jesus and what he asks of you through a well-informed conscious. It's possible to remove a lot of that ambiguity.

 

Faith AND works anon.

The Eucharist is for us and is Christ; he really stresses that in John 6. It is very literal.

Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 8:53 a.m. No.8333252   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3269

>>8333226

>the bible

>compiled by the Church

>not the sacraments of the Church given by Christ to Peter

 

Anyone who reads the bible can come up with their own bizarre fanfic; look at any protestant sect. The scripture needs to be tied to the tradition in proper context.

Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 9:01 a.m. No.8333292   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8333269

Then by following the words of Paul are you not doing the same? Paul partook in the breaking of bread; that "human tradition" because it was established by Christ. He was teaching against heresy and wordliness.

 

Proper philosophy always leads to God, from there one finds the revelation of God in Christ; we have more than his words but his traditions. The Church to this day does exactly as He instructed: eat my flesh and drink my blood or you have no life in you. And, "do this is memory of me"

Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 9:03 a.m. No.8333308   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>8333282

it's the ultimate rationale

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ways_(Aquinas)

God certainly exists. From there you can define a lot about him purely through logic but not completely without the revelation of God Himself; through his Son. All St Aquinas did he equated to nothing in the end compared to the fullness of God

Anonymous ID: e5cd52 March 6, 2020, 9:19 a.m. No.8333415   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3451 >>3473

>>8333347

oh yeah read the bread of life duh how did I not think of that

 

>For the bread of God is that which cometh down from heaven, and giveth life to the world.

bible didn't exist then

 

>They said therefore unto him: Lord, give us always this bread. [35] And Jesus said to them: I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall not hunger: and he that believeth in me shall never thirst.

no doubt you agree here

 

>Amen, amen I say unto you: He that believeth in me, hath everlasting life. [48] I am the bread of life. [49] Your fathers did eat manna in the desert, and are dead. [50] This is the bread which cometh down from heaven; that if any man eat of it, he may not die.

He gets a little more literal here; he is not referring to manna from heaven as the Bread of Life

 

>[52] If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever; and the bread that I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world.

boom.

 

> [53] The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying: How can this man give us his flesh to eat? [54] Then Jesus said to them: Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.

he reiterates

 

>He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day.

a third time

 

>For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. [57] He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him.

 

>[61] Many therefore of his disciples, hearing it, said: This saying is hard, and who can hear it?

now why would so many leave for a figurative saying of Jesus? Fact is it wasn't.