Anonymous ID: 5d3ef7 March 6, 2020, 4:48 p.m. No.8336795   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7070 >>7263 >>7323

GS66 2-KYCM G6 UK military contractor out of San Francisco Int'l

 

This left Beijing on weds night Cap#2 CONUS time and stopped in Tokyo then continued on to SFO and landed yesterday.

 

Registration: Geneva, Switzerland and Guernsey

Anonymous ID: 5d3ef7 March 6, 2020, 5:10 p.m. No.8337011   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7080

>>8336782

>>8336833

the system for tracking Job creation is imperfect at best. It uses a methodology of rolling averages of a ten-year time period. So, if over that ten year period if the backward looking data says that 10k jobs were produced in February..then POOF! it is reported this way. You have to look at the labor participation rate and even that is fucked with-although it is somewhat harder to do. Now the reason POTUS is not criticized for any of this is that THEY created this system and all he has to do is say "Hey it's your legacy program I'm usingโ€ฆ"

They way it has been calculated over the years was changed drastically starting with 41 and over the years it was changed and altered to reflect whatever narrative the current or coming admin wanted to produce.

Go here for a better read on actual job numbers.

http://www.shadowstats.com/

Anonymous ID: 5d3ef7 March 6, 2020, 5:25 p.m. No.8337155   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8337080

5:5 brutha. It's been bullshit for a long time. At least that site is closer to what th real picture is. Look at U6 rate too. Nothing but a real factual attempt at this will ever be sufficient. They try to tell us that they don't have the ability or manpower to do it yet look where computing power is.

 

https://www.macrotrends.net/1377/u6-unemployment-rate