>>8341770

>Sadly, since that tweet two years ago, the Trump administration and Republicans have done nothing as Facebook continues to eliminate conservative content and publishers.

>Facebook has been shutting down traffic to conservative websites since the 2016 election

So, if true, can someone explain to me why Soro's has his panties in a wade about Zuckerberg, claiming that he needs to be removed as CEO because he is somehow secretly colluding with Trump to give Trump an advantage in the 2020 election??

>>8341904

>Probably means that Trump has Zuckerberg by the balls somehow and Soros is sounding the alarm to other deep state actors: "Zuck has been captured by Trump, he will not help us this time around."

This makes the most logical sense considering:

1) Zuckerberg is on record saying that he doesn't think Facebook should be put into a position of having to make decisions about curtailing free speech.

2) Soros rarely targets individuals himself publicly by name. More often he has his NGO minions do that for him.

>>8341905

>you know, like you did just now…

explain to me how asking a question answers the same question