>>8143264 (pb)

Re: Crowdstrike backpedaling

"The potential implications and fallout of this week's developments from Rod Wheeler and Seymour Hersh are truly staggering. I just want to lay that out for everybody. (self.WikiLeaks)

submitted 2 years ago by dancing-turtle:

I just wrote this in a comment, but decided to make a new post to see if anyone can point out problems with this logic, or anything I'm not considering.

I'm seriously on the edge of my seat about this, ever since Tuesday.

IF (A) Wheeler's allegations are true that Trump is directly involved in pushing the Seth Rich story, and IF (B) Hersh's source described in the leaked audio WikiLeaks tweeted is legit and correct, then it logically follows that:

The Seth Rich/WikiLeaks connection is real, and the Russia narrative, or at least the DNC hacking component of it, is false.

The DNC and MSM may be complicit in covering up a murder, and federal investigation into this possibility will become essential.

Trump was trying to push the Seth Rich story to debunk the Russia narrative.

Trump wanted to accomplish this without it being traceable back to him, for obvious reasons.

Trump therefore couldn't declassify the FBI document/s without compromising his plan, but was relying on an anonymous FBI source, Rod Wheeler, and Fox News to break the story to the public at large. This was successfully obstructed by MSM/DNC damage control.

BUT – now that the White House's alleged role has been exposed, Trump has no disincentive, and every incentive, to declassify whatever information the FBI has on Seth Rich. The president can declassify anything he wants, whenever he wants, with no red tape.

Therefore, IF both (A) and (B) are true, Trump could now blow the lid off the whole thing any moment he chooses and bring down god knows what kind of dominos. IF (A) and (B) are true, the DNC are scared shitless right now, and will be bringing out the big guns to attempt to save their hides. Yesterday's Grand Jury announcement suggests that Trump's opposition have no intention of deescalating on the Russia narrative. Therefore, IF (A) and (B) are true, shit is going to get very very interesting.

We can debate about how likely we think (A) and (B) are, but if they are true… holy shit."

https://www.reddit.com/r/WikiLeaks/comments/6rp1zt/the_potential_implications_and_fallout_of_this/