>>1089171
appreciate your thoughts and efforts, and glad
to have your experience in the room.
imo the side by sides are not for main stream,
or at least not now. Most believeQ here on
these boards, obviously. But as soon as you
attempt to explainQ outside these boards,
what happens? This leads to having to
proveQ and prove corruption. Proving the
corruption is difficult enough, esp with
MSMfakeNews successfully hypnotizing the
masses. Upon addingQ, now must prove
another figure. Twice the effort.
How to lighten the load? LeaveQ out. Those
that want know more aboutQ can join us
on the boards. For those we are attempting
to inform/wakeup/redpill, leaveQ out and
use the information thatQ leads us too to wake
them up to the fakeNewsCorruption all
around.
If agree with this, then side by side you
describe not applicable.
Having said, that idea still has potential.
Instead of Qsidebyside with Trump, try
TrumpTweets sidebyside with topics he
mentions, example slimeballComey.
Imagine TrumpTweet, side by side with his
topic, such as slimeball to use to inform
with much much sauce, undeniable
evidence, that TrumpIs correct in his
assessment of slimeball.
This leave hard to proveQ out of the effort,
thus lightening the load, while also pointing
out how Prez is undeniably right. Those
would make some powerful graphics imo.
In this way, no head shot needed, don't
have to proveQ. While still showing ppl,
why they should be careful who they follow.
>>1089529
Thanks for tip, will test highlight.
"magnify th"
this is extra step, which take time, which
may not be worth it, if time is short. imo
use good resolution, and readers can zoom
in on their own. Good resolution and light
compression go a long way, and helps with
speed of creation and down/uploads.