We have an army of Q followers who post information that is connected by hashtags. But we should start or improve a Q special forces of veteran Q anon researchers who have twitter accounts, to tweet@/reply/challenge/debate libs, influential people, conservatives, etc..

I did it this morning and I got so much more feedback then just using the hashtag, I reply to one guy and 10 more of his buddies chime in to debate me as well. This is who we should be targeting, the people who have no idea/think they know it all. Plus it gets the opportunity for the target's followers to read the discussion between the two of you and see your hashtags and your points you make, links you post, etc.

The special forces would have to be only the elite of us who can handle civil debate and have loads of supporting evidence (links,news,gov. documents, etc.) on hand and at the ready.

What would need to be done:

Create a playbook of debate strategies

Create a database of verified Q connections to POTUS, to news articles, to past historical events, etc.. 'The proofs' to support the debate strategies.

Create a target list

I can see 30, well read, well informed, and well sourced anons, strategically disemmenate a standardized Q message to those hotshot 10k-100k+ follower twitter account's posts and comments section, and it would be deadly. The amount of exposure you get from debating randoms' is crazy.

If this is already a thing, sign me up, if not we should definitely get this going.

>>920321

Thanks for the reply, I checked out the page and the Iinks section I can't access. I will get back to you (I know where to find you ;)) when I can formulate the strategies to match with the links. I see where your coming from for the general plan for people who want to help, I still think that we need anons who travel into the jungle to debate and attract them back to the hashtag. Exposure is the most important thing at this point. I will look into forming the task force myself, because if you want something done right, you do it yourself.