Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 8, 2018, 9:26 a.m. No.951579   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>950619

 

just a note,

Do not trust the last hour of

hastags. org.

 

aka the last data point.

 

That will always appear to be down,

just the way their system is built,

i suppose.

 

so imo hashtags. org is dependable but

that last data point is not determined

until after the hour is over, so the last data point can be misleading.

 

so imo accept all data points except final one.

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 8, 2018, 9:32 a.m. No.951658   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Conclusion: WAR ROOM SUGGESTS EVERY ANON ADDS #QAnon to all messages & ADDS WHATEVER THEY WANT as for other hashtags.

 

pretty good, keep in mind no more than 5 total,

hash, always add @POTUS.

 

idea dnf

don't use a hash if it's not over 800 twts per

hour verified at hashtags. org.

unless making a point exm: #TrustSessions

keep in mind not to use the last data point,

as it is not set yet.

idea dnf = do not fire

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 8, 2018, 9:41 a.m. No.951765   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

idea dnf simple instructions.

 

Push 5 hash max.

#QAnon on all twts.

4 optional but verify at hashtags. org

that each hash used is over 800 per hour.

 

Even #Coffee would be acceptable, IF over

800 twts an hour.

 

idea dnf

 

notes:

 

As time goes on, the more advance graph

that Eurt displays will make more sense,

from ritetag. com.

 

Ritetag is a day behind, so do not use that

to verify hashes are over 800perHour for

current day. Instead use hashtags .org to

verify current twts per hour, but ignore final

data point, as it is not set yet.

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 8, 2018, 9:46 a.m. No.951818   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2133

>>951012

 

still in planning phase, dnf = do not fire.

 

Once we all agree, then can share.

 

If share too early, then have to go back and

correct, if we make changes, subtract,

delete, etc.

 

Too many corrections, people lose patience

and confidence.

 

Try get plan perfect, less corrections, easy

game.

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 8, 2018, 11:01 a.m. No.952719   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>2839

>>952133

 

so far all recent ideas seem good.

 

The rough draft graphic you are currently

working on will indicate further revision

or ready to fire.

 

Basically keep it simple, so newbies can join.

Very important for us to get truth out.

Just as important for people to join us in our

efforts, so directions/concept needs to

be simple as possible. Can't ask too much,

but enough must be done to create a change.

 

Recent ideas posted are all great and in

the right direction, so last piece is graphic,

as far as twtr effort goes.

 

Other efforts are also underway such as FB

effort, Discord, etc. On those, tactics must

be modified to fit those system models. I can

only comment twtr, where I been testing.

 

Keep them separate in your minds, the tactics.

 

The idea is same, spread info, get people to

join. How? That is what we search for. If

you have tactic ideas, test them, if great

results, report them here and work with others

on same platform.

 

Those that know twtr, don't know Discord,

so keep them separate in mind for now, tactic

wise. What might work good on twtr, might not

work so good other platforms, etc.

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 16, 2018, 12:39 a.m. No.1062397   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Easier to twt with extreme sauce, confirmation

from general. Without good research, twters

not sure if they are getting good info out.

 

Bad info, lose credibility. Keep this in mind

when requesting WarRm to twt.

 

We are no where near large enough to reach

#Releaseโ€ฆ numbers unless all of General

joins, but that has not happened. Also, this

effort must be sustained through out the day,

not just 1 twt each.

 

However, we can still get word out, even with

our small numbers. Basically, we need

perfect memes, combined with perfect twts,

to produce greatest effect.

 

The results corresponds directly with the

effort and the number of people united in the

effort. Keep in mind, when specific results

are sought.

Anonymous ID: 3efd68 April 16, 2018, 12:55 a.m. No.1062447   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>1061208

imo bad plan.

Twting evil that they are evil, pointless.

If twting about evil, twt toward good neighbors,

that need to know.

Notifying the enemy you know,

only alerts him.

Instead, notify good people until they censor

efforts to spread details, sauce, etc.

 

Also, making move on "if" is not solid footing.

"If Brennan was involved "

 

Efforts better aimed elsewhere imo,

specifically tarmac, LL, HRC, server, Bill, SC,

RBG. Time line running back to 2010, plot

all connections, make it easy for people to

understand, with much much sauce.