Anonymous ID: 000000 March 7, 2020, 7:24 p.m. No.8345365   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5406

>>8345348

Reminder that vaginas feel different. Different shape, different size, different tent length. Different ribbings, different tightness, different kegel fitness. Hotdog in a hallway sometimes. But the doctor can sew up the vagina after childbirth. Make it tight again.

 

Asses are where the waste comes out. We're animals. Shit moves through pipes in the streets. Think about how that looks to the aliens.

Anonymous ID: 000000 March 7, 2020, 8:48 p.m. No.8345878   🗄️.is đź”—kun

iOS, The Future Of macOS, Freedom, Security And Privacy In An Increasingly Hostile Global Environment

 

https://gist.github.com/iosecure/357e724811fe04167332ef54e736670d

 

This post by a security researcher who prefers to remain anonymous will elucidate concerns about certain problematic decisions Apple has made and caution about future decisions made in the name of “security” while potentially hiding questionable motives. The content of this article represents only the opinion of the researcher. The researcher apologises if any content is seen to be inaccurate, and is open to comments or questions through PGP-encrypted mail.

 

TL;DR

 

iOS subliminally and constantly collects sensitive data, links it to hardware identifiers almost guaranteed to link to a real identity

 

iOS forces users to “activate” devices (including non-cellular) which sets up a remote UUID-linked (also collecting registration IP) database for a given device with Apple for APNS/iMessage/FaceTime/Siri, and then Apple ID, iCloud etc. Apple ought be open to users about “activation” and allow users to avoid it.

 

Apple Activation servers are accessed via Akamai, which means sensitive data may be cached by Akamai and its’ peering partners' which includes many global ISPs and IXPs

 

Risk that macOS could be iOS-ified in the near future in the name of “security” while ignoring significant flaws in iOS’ design wrt privacy, forcing users to unnecessarily trust Apple with potentially sensitive data in order to even simply use devices.

 

Controversial, draconian surveillance laws being implemented worldwide which could take advantage of Apple’s data collection and OS design choices, notably in, but not limited to, China, one of Apple's largest markets.

 

If iOS is to really be considered a secure OS, and if vanilla macOS is to become more secure, independent end-user control must be considered. Increased low-level design security at the cost of control, and the ability to prevent leaking data, cannot be considered a real improvement in security.