>>8346858

Denied Immigration Status – Denied Appeal - Petition Your Representative[S] in Congress

After being denied immigration, denied on appeal, then 2 years to apply for visa on a claim of asylum and torture. None of the bills specifies why the person(s) require relief or prior appeal dismissals.

Fortunately such bills are unlikely to leave committee but reflects the ethics and “respect” for laws by Congress.

You may have MORE THAN 1 Representative in Congress.

HR 5624 Melnyk Ruslana and Gnatyuk Mykhaylo

Rep Davis IL-7 / 2 years to apply for visa

Ukrainian denied asylum request and denied appeal in 2018

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5624/text

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/15-3615/15-3615-2018-05-25.htmlHR 5622

HR 5623 Tetyana Zvarychuk

Rep Davis IL-7 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5623/text

Igor Klyuchenko

Rep Davis IL-7 / 2 years to apply for visa

Ukrainian denied asylum request and denied appeal in 2013

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5622/text

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/13-1389/13-1389-2013-11-25.html

HR 5058 Alirio Palacios Gamez, Hilda Veronica Ramirez Mendez, and Jayro Ivan Juarez Ramirez

Rep Doggett TX-35 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/5058/text

H.R.4539 Alirio Palacios Gamez, Hilda Veronica Ramirez Mendez, and Jayro Ivan Juarez Ramirez.

Rep Castro TX-20 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4539/text

HR 4225/ S 2612 Maria Isabel Bueso Barrera, Alberto Bueso Mendoza, Karla Maria Barrera De Bueso, and Ana Lucia Bueso Barrera

Rep DeSaulner CA-11 / 2 years to apply for visa

Sen Feinstein CA

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4225/text

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/2612/text

HR 4224 Edith Espinal Moreno

Mexican denied asylum request in 2016 and denied appeal in 2017

Rep Beatty OH-3 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/4224/text

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca6/16-4326/16-4326-2017-07-21.html

HR 3750 Rene Alexander Garcia Maldonado

Rep Clay MO-1 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3750/text

HR 3455 Ingrid Encalada Latorre

Rep Neguse CO-2 / 2 years to apply for visa

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3455/text

If people seeking asylum were truely in fear for their lives, why would they need 2 years to re-apply aft refusal and appeal denial? Congress is STUPID

HR 3222 would prohibit DHS from using public funds for removing people deemed inadmissable

Evidently free-loaders are great for the economy and local government services according to Rep Chu's bill.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3222/text

HR 3222 No Federal Funds for Public Charge Act of 2019

To provide that no Federal funds may be used to carry out the proposed rule of the Department of Homeland Security entitled “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds”, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “No Federal Funds for Public Charge Act of 2019”.

SEC. 2. SENSE OF CONGRESS.

It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) immigrants and their families are a core part of our Nation;

(2) their health and safety is critical to the health and safety of our communities;

(3) Federal, State, and local assistance programs promote self-sufficiency by ensuring that families, including immigrant and mixed-status families, maintain their health, strength, and stability, and can continue contributing to the Nation’s social and economic life;

(4) the proposed rule of the Department of Homeland Security entitled “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds” is a sweeping and dangerous proposal that will impede access to essential food, medical care, and housing for many families;

(5) the proposed rule would damage State and local economies while burdening health and service providers, and the Department of Homeland Security itself, in the preamble of the proposed rule, acknowledges the severe consequences of this proposal including that it could cause “worse health outcomes, including increased prevalence of obesity and malnutrition, especially for pregnant or breast­feed­ing women, infants, or children”, that it may “decrease disposable income and increase the poverty of certain families and children, including U.S. citizen children” and that it could lead to “reduced revenues for healthcare providers”, “pharmacies”, “companies that manufacture medical supplies or pharmaceuticals”, “grocery retailers”, and “agricultural producers”; and

(6) the proposed rule would circumvent Congress and reverse 100 years of law and policy, restricting immigration and chilling access to services for which immigrants and their citizen family members are eligible, in a manner not authorized or contemplated by Congress.

SEC. 3. RESTRICTION ON FEDERAL FUNDS.

No Federal funds (including fees) made available for any fiscal year, may be used to implement, administer, enforce, or carry out the proposed rule of the Department of Homeland Security entitled “Inadmissibility on Public Charge Grounds”.

>>8346879

pocket watch is a mechanical device.

it has moving parts that create friction which generates heat.

watches are man-made so that is man-made global warming.

your going to make Greta cry again when I squeal that you are promoting

the use of pocket watches that cause man-made global warming.

kek

>>8346893

itz my civil disoediance to grammar in a small box

(I spelled you're wrong in another post, used your… i'm a baddd puppy)

cute kitty though