Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 10:26 a.m. No.8349196   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9204

>>8349162

 

Wrap-up smear is different.

This is to make people seem crazy - kid goes missing. Dad is sick with grief. Starts non-profit to hunt for missing children. Was complicit in his own child's disappearance/rape/torture/death the whole time. Non-profit ensures kids arent found rather than rescuing anyone. But youd have to be crazy to draw this conclusion, how dare you!

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 10:47 a.m. No.8349344   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9393 >>9815

>>8349318

You forgot how hemp is renewable and doesnt harm the soil, which makes it infinitely cheaper in the long run since it is harvested annually rather than having to wait years for trees to grow. Think big picture rather than quick returns. Hemp is far better for all applications than any of the things which replaced it after the Hearst/DuPont reefer madness campaign got it outlawed

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 10:50 a.m. No.8349375   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9381

>>8349337

>>8349337

When thinking about it as just weed, one forgets that there is also hemp to be considered. This industry is something that will be huuuge, not just pharmaceutically but all kinds of other applications like paper, other textiles. It got derailed for reasons unrelated to ingestion. That was just the easy hot-button way to get the public on board. Hearst and his buddies knew what they were doing

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 11:02 a.m. No.8349487   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9542

>>8349471

Agreed. Also think he wont do it until he can be sure the industrial complex wont hijack hemp production. This is so much bigger than just weed for smoking and edibles. Hemp got weed outlawed, not the other way around. Needs a lot of protecting before it gets unleashed again

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 11:12 a.m. No.8349577   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8349542

>>8349542

The thing is, if you just researched it a LITTLE, it would make TONS of sense to you. I dropped the names Hearst and Dupont. If you were truly interested in anything besides shilling you would already have gone looking.

One of us isnt posting stuff out of our asses -

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 11:27 a.m. No.8349707   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9717 >>9736

>>8349649

>>8349649

History, you say? How about 1938, will that work for you?

 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/environment/a19876318/popular-mechanics-billion-dollar-hemp/

 

Please learn to research. History is your friend, as are logical thinking and discernment. After you read this, go find out what year hemp/marijuana were outlawed and think about it for a minute. Seriously

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 11:35 a.m. No.8349760   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>8349736

Agreed. They robbed the wealth of a nation to protect the wealth of their families when they could have afforded to switch over themselves and shared with everyone, keeping their own wealth in the bargain. Criminal on the highest levels, and almost unfathomable that it was allowed to happen.

But the masses fell for muh reefer madness, and are falling for it still, while clutching their pearls

Anonymous ID: ea2138 March 8, 2020, 11:49 a.m. No.8349865   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9877 >>9887

>>8349815

Sorry, but your thinking isnt deep enough to have an intelligent discussion of the topic, and I'm not interested in trying to help you because you keep posting the same trope. It's a waste of my time and yours. I wish it were otherwise, but you just keep on with the same misguided thoughts/posts. I give up